Via Amander Carpenter’s Twitter, “this” being a list of ten conservative women that a Playboy Forum author would like to “hate-”… I’m not going to finish that term. Amanda’s on the list, which makes this a rather personal insult for her; but it’s plenty ugly on its own.
You know, when I was a Democrat – and reading Playboy, might I add – the magazine would have rather gnawed off a leg than offer this level of misogyny to women, in any medium that sported their corporate logo. What the hell happened?
Moe Lane
PS: There’s a rather obvious omission, by the way. Probably because this Guy Cimbalo person is too scared of her husband stopping by and kicking his ass.
[UPDATE] PPS: See also here, in the ‘credit where credit is due’ folder.
Crossposted to RedState.
, and is (to the best to my knowledge) in the public domain.
[...] to Moe Lane. Sphere: Related Content Share on: Facebook | digg_url = [...]
The other glaring omission?
The one she’ll be in a huff because she’s not on that list?
Meg McCain.
Its never been acceptable nor will it ever be.
Looks like Playboy took down the page. Ah, those courageous progressive souls!
Yep, it’s gone.
[...] Moe Lane says: You know, when I was a Democrat – and reading Playboy, might I add – the magazine would have rather gnawed off a leg than offer this level of misogyny to women, in any medium that sported their corporate logo. What the hell happened? [...]
[...] at the Sundries Shack writes: But to answer [Moe Lane's] question, I think the answer is simple. What happened is that the left has made it very clear that [...]
[...] at the end (around 32:30) when I was talking about what Little Miss Attila noted was only not a ‘rape’ list if you could honestly expect that a woman would knowingly and voluntarily have sex under those [...]
[...] at the end (around 32:30) when I was talking about what Little Miss Attila noted was only not a ‘rape’ list if you could honestly expect that a woman would knowingly and voluntarily have sex under those [...]