Slapdash, or scaredy-cat? Does it matter?
The lack of self-respect in the Obama administration astounds me, sometimes. From the (probably-now abortive) pushback on the call to shut down repatriating AQ terrorists to Yemen:
“I am aware of a lot of people pointing back at the way the transfers were handled under the Bush administration that apparently they have some concerns about that,” said the official, who had not seen the senators’ letter. “I didn’t hear many of those concerns at the time, but there were obviously hundreds and hundreds of detainees that were transferred under the old regime.”
The official hadn’t also seen Sen. Feinstein’s (D) own shared concern about said repatriation, which as Ed Morrissey notes is a serious problem for the drive to close Gitmo. But never mind that, right now: what gives with all the unforced errors? I mean, if this was an unintentional attempt to give offense, it’s pretty sloppy thinking; and if it was intentional, well, way to go with putting words in the administration’s mouth there, Sparky. A true progressive would have had the elementary courage to put his or her Bush Derangement Syndrome on the record.
Well, either way I can’t say that I’m surprised.
Moe Lane
Crossposted to RedState.
“Regime” here may refer to the set of procedures, as in “exercise regime”, rather than to the former administration. The adjective used is “old”, not “prior” or “last”.
So, you’re going with ‘slapdash,’ then? 🙂
I’m sorry — did I not say “slapdash”?
Slapdash.