This word ‘communicator.’ I do not think it means what you think it means. #rsrh

There was something about this Susan Estrich column on the death throes of the health care rationing bill that bugged me – and no, it wasn’t its basic point:

So what went wrong? Every Democrat I talk to has a different answer or, rather, a different person to blame. It was Nancy Pelosi’s fault or Harry Reid’s or Rahm Emanuel’s. Should have made a bigger show of reaching out to Republicans; shouldn’t have cut those deals behind closed doors. It is, I am told every day, a communications problem.

Years ago, when I was working in politics, I had a meeting with our pollsters that I’ll never forget. After a particularly detailed (and negative) survey, one of the guys who had been polling for years leaned over to me and said, “We have a very big problem. People just don’t like our candidate.” Not an ideological problem. Not a problem with his experience or positions. They just didn’t like him.

Of course, you can’t tell your candidate that the people don’t like him. So we looked at each other and shook our heads. There is only one way to translate that result. Candidate, we said to him, the people don’t know you.

The White House is trying to treat the problem with its health care proposal as a communications problem.

I happen to agree with the basic point, you see.  At any rate, I finally figured out what was bugging me about it, and it was this sentence:

Barack Obama is a great communicator.

As somebody once said of Pompey the Great: ‘Great’ as compared to whom?

Technical skill at reading a speech I’ll grant – although if I hear one more version of the Why I Am The Synthesis of The Two Sides To Whatever Problem Is Bugging You People This Week I may start a tequila IV drip – but he doesn’t particularly impress when it comes to off-the-cuff remarks, unscripted conversations, or just plain personal moments.  I’m not even sure if he’s had any of the latter where we could see him.  For that matter, the President has consciously adopted a policy of simply not being available to communicate, even with the White House press corps.  Declarations and pronouncements, sure.  Two-way interaction?  Not so much.

If I were still of the President’s party, this would trouble me.  Since I’m not, I’m just going to not put a copy on this directly on RedState and hope that’s enough to keep the Other Side from really noticing the problem.

Moe Lane

4 thoughts on “This word ‘communicator.’ I do not think it means what you think it means. #rsrh”

  1. Even if the Other Side noticed the problem, what could they really do about it?

    That is, other than primary Obama in 2012, but vague rumors about that are already going around anyways. Everyone’s already wondering when Hillary is going to cut and run, and that was before Bayh dissed his own party with his exit announcement. And when was the last time a sitting president was successfully primaried, anyways? Not in the modern era– Johnson saw the writing on the wall and bowed out; the chances of Obama doing that are slim to none.

    No, the Democrats bought the ticket of Hope ‘N Change, and now they’re going to take the ride, and it isn’t going to be a pretty end.

    Pass the popcorn.

  2. Of course, Pompey the Great conquered everywhere he went, massively exceeded the incredibly high standards of the Roman Republic and was only bested as an old man by one of the uniquely talented military geniuses of history. So ‘Great’ compared to pretty much everyone in the last few decades at least. If you are going to try to cut down Obama, at least compare him to someone worthy of criticism. I suspect your ass would be handed to you by Julius Caesar as well, but I think Spartacus’ army would have kicked your ass in a New York Minute.

  3. No – I just know a little about history… My major was astrophysics so I didn’t do any history beyond the requirements.

Comments are closed.