Well, well, well. Short version? All three Republican national committees raised more than their Democratic counterparts for the first time in… well, a while.
A while.
| Raised | CoH | Debts | |
| RNC | 7.69 | 9.46 | 0.00 |
| DNC | 7.42 | 10.74 | 3.72 |
| NRSC | 4.60 | 12.86 | 0.00 |
| DSCC | 4.00 | 14.30 | 0.42 |
| NRCC | 5.08 | 6.06 | 0.00 |
| DCCC | 4.35 | 19.82 | 0.67 |
| GOP | 17.37 | 28.38 | 0.00 |
| Dem | 15.77 | 44.86 | 4.81 |
It’s not all sunshine and roses, of course: the DCCC’s maintaining an almost 14 million dollar distance over the NRCC, at least for the moment. On the bright side, the current ratio of at-risk seats is 53 to 6. Interesting to see how that shakes out.
Moe Lane
PS: The usual drill:
If it hurts too much, try Reverse the Vote! Specifically targets 24 Congressional Democrats in Red districts, goes straight to the general election candidates, the national committees don’t see a dime.
Crossposted to RedState.

[...] So let’s all hope that doesn’t become an issue, hey? Yes, even the DNC/DCCC: I don’t think that they want to get dragged into this any further than they have to, February fundraising deficit or no. [...]
[...] So let’s all hope that doesn’t become an issue, hey? Yes, even the DNC/DCCC: I don’t think that they want to get dragged into this any further than they have to, February fundraising deficit or no. [...]
[...] (Via Riehl World View) I mean, I know that he hangs with the President and everything, but, hey: on spelling errors alone surely we’re entitled to raise some cash off of him. Particularly since he’s an actual racist, and not one of the imaginary ones that you constructed to get monthly revenues back up after February. [...]
[...] (Via Riehl World View) I mean, I know that he hangs with the President and everything, but, hey: on spelling errors alone surely we’re entitled to raise some cash off of him. Particularly since he’s an actual racist, and not one of the imaginary ones that you constructed to get monthly revenues back up after February. [...]