The implications of that analogy by Ed Driscoll (guesting for Instapundit) – that Obama would there be an American President visiting a country that is in opposition to his ideology – are… disturbing.
No, not because it’s self-evidently a silly analogy. It’s not self-evidently a silly analogy. That’s why it’s disturbing.
PS: If you’re keeping score, I don’t think that the President actively hates Israel, in anything like the same intensity found by your average antiwar activist. I do think that he doesn’t grok what the consequences of his actions are when it comes to Israel, which is highly problematical right there.