The Obama administration has urged the Supreme Court to toss out an appeals court decision that would allow lawsuits against major emitters for their contributions to global warming, stunning environmentalists who see the case as a powerful prod on climate change.

(Via Hot Air Headlines)

He can be taught! – Mind you, the argument here from the government is that the EPA has regulatory authority over carbon dioxide already, thus making it unnecessary for guaranteed-heavy Democratic donor groups to pursue punitive lawsuits against not-guaranteed-heavy Democratic donor groups.  Or is that too cynical?  Heck, does “too cynical” even mean anything, these days?

For added fun, there’s this:

Matt Pawa, an attorney representing plaintiffs in the case, said he and his colleagues expected the White House to stay out of the matter. During a meeting with more than 30 administration lawyers at the solicitor general’s office on June 24, it seemed they had “a lot of friends in the room,” he said.

“We feel stabbed in the back,” Pawa said.

Well, that’s to be expected.  Every time this administration tries to stab somebody in the front they mess it up somehow.

Moe Lane

1 Comment

  • Carolyn Wolthusen says:

    Obama is simply averse to E-wackos spending money on legal fees that rightly belong to his ’12 campaign coffers. We’re in a recession, after all

    Redneck Hippie

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Site by Neil Stevens | Theme by