Aug
16
2010
--

Submitted with one comment.

I’d normally link to where I saw this, but it had… objectionable tags.

Aug
16
2010
2

Hey, Ray Bradbury will be 90 in a week!

And he sounds nicely… cantankerous.

Bradbury wrote darkly about bookburning in “Fahrenheit 451,” but he sounds ready to use a Kindle for kindling. “I was approached three times during the last year by Internet companies wanting to put my books” on an electronic reading device, he said. “I said to Yahoo, ‘Prick up your ears and go to hell.’ “

He’s right, by the way: the man doesn’t write science fiction. He writes myths that sometimes have rocket ships in them.

Aug
16
2010
1

#rsrh Sen. Levin hit with pie.

A couple of Lefty antiwar nuts, we-hate-the-Jews edition:

Ahlam Mohsen, 23, a Michigan State University senior, was arrested by the Big Rapids Department of Public Safety after the incident. The assault came after a speech by another protester, Max Kantar, 23, of Big Rapids, who criticized [Sen Carl] Levin [D, MI] – chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee – for his stance on U.S. foreign policy issues, including “Israel war crimes against the Palestinian people.” After Mohsen pied the long-time senator, both she and Kantar fled from Pepper’s.

I mention this mostly because you have to look at the picture: (more…)

Aug
16
2010
1

Reid’s new Angle on 9/11 mosque.

Sharron Angle went off on Harry Reid on the subject of the Ground Zero Mosque this morning – she takes the position that while people have the right to build a mosque there, they should show some delicacy of their own and build it somewhere else – and Greg Sargent was practically licking his chops in response. He was of the opinion that making opposition to the President’s position – once we figure it out – a midterm issue would be a bad idea for Republicans, and he leaped on Angle’s opposition:

Angle’s position, apparently, is that the group has the right to build the center but Obama is wrong to have voiced support for that right. After all, he didn’t directly endorse the project anywhere, nor should he have. I would like to hear Reid break his silence on the issue, though.

I’m guessing that Sargent reconsidered that wish, once Reid actually spoke out… and took the position that while people have the right to build a mosque there, they should show some delicacy of their own and build it somewhere else. Which is not surprising: the mosque is extremely unpopular, to the point where it’s even less so than, well, Harry Reid. So much so that Reid’s reflexive adoption of his opponent’s position (no matter how matter it makes knee-jerk liberals pound their heads against the wall) was preferable than taking a contrary stand. (more…)

Aug
16
2010
--

#rsrh Go gouge greenbacks from GOP!

I have to say, I like the layout of The West [Coast S]Wing: it’s a project by the NRCC to fundraise $100 grand for the fall elections in response to Obama and Pelosi fundraising at an elitist Hollywood function tonight.  Matching contributions from Republican House Members, so go nuts.

Generally speak, I have to say: the new NRCC website aesthetics are pretty good.  Solid, not flashy, not gimmicky.  Good work there.

Written by in: Politics | Tags:
Aug
16
2010
2

Obamacare worth 17.5K dead women a year?

Apparently.

If you’ve missed the Avastin controversy, here’s a quick summary of it: Avastin is a general anti-cancer drug that got fast-tracked by the FDA a few years ago and is now prescribed to under 18 thousand women a year in the United States who suffer from the last stages of breast cancer.  It doesn’t cure the cancer; it has side effects; and its beneficial effects are disputed… but the drug has its defenders as well as its detractors.  However, now the FDA is contemplating reversing its approval of Avastin, which would probably mean the end of both its coverage by Medicare, and a subsidy program for low-income women.

Why?

Because then it won’t be covered by Medicare and the government can end the subsidy program for low-income women, of course.  The difficulty here for Obamacare supporters is that Avastin can cost up to $100K a year – the aforementioned subsidy program only covers about 40% of that, by the way – and under Obamacare the government would have to be the one to make the awkward and politically fraught call on whether or not to spend a lot of money making available a drug that doesn’t magically destroy cancer on the spot.  It’s another ‘take a pill‘ kind of situation, in other words: or to be even more inflammatory (but perfectly accurate), it’s another ‘death panel’ kind of situation.  There’s no good answer for an Obamacare enthusiast: if the drug’s available and you subsidize it, that’s up to a couple of billion dollars right there per year that the government will have to pay for a treatment of disputed efficacy (and demand for the drug will assuredly go up, if it’s subsidized).  If the drug’s available and you don’t subsidize it, you’re denying care under your system that was available previously (which is precisely what has been promised as not going to happen).  But if you can get the FDA to remove the approval, well… problem solved, right?

Assuming that you don’t have advanced breast cancer, of course.

Moe Lane

PS: Yes, I’m sure that the FDA will deny that cost considerations are what’s driving this possible reversal of approval.  Yes, certainly, of course they would have made the incredibly rare call of re-reviewing a fast-track drug if Avastin only cost $100/year.

PPS: The central fallacy of Obamacare is that it assumes that you can repeal the laws of supply and demand if you wish hard enough.  When it comes to socialized medicine… increased coverage, decreased costs, better service: pick one.

No, if you want to be able to pick two you need to go back to a market-driven solution.

Aug
16
2010
3

Sure, the fashion industry doesn’t…

…exacerbate body image issues.

Sure, it doesn’t.

I don’t know where I saw this, but ye gods and little fishes!

There is no possible way that 99.N% of the female population could achieve a look like that without major surgery*.  And possibly time on the rack.

Moe Lane

PS: Must have been Instapundit where I saw it first.

*The expression on that Miss J. Alexander guy is priceless (and speaks well of the fellow); click through to see it.

Aug
16
2010
7

President fully entangled in 9/11 Mosque affair.

There’s been a good deal of discussion over whether the President should have gotten involved with the conflict over whether to build a mosque in Ground Zero*.  Certainly the President himself has had second thoughts about that: his strong statement on Friday was followed up by a predictable backtrack on Saturday, and the anonymous sniping from his own administration officials over that was likewise inevitable.  But what probably should not be a point of contention is that the issue is getting in the President’s way on other things.

For example, remember the Gulf? – Because the President wishes that you had.  Unfortunately for him, President Obama’s comments last weekend completely fouled his later attempts to tout the Gulf for tourism**.

It was meant to be a quick family trip to the Gulf Coast to show that local beaches are safe for swimming and that the Obamas can vacation as humbly as the next family.

But President Obama’s visit was overshadowed by his foray into the dispute over the mosque planned near the former World Trade Center site, once again drowning out what was supposed to be a sharp, focused message.

Like it or not, but the country wants to talk about the mosque thing.  And they’re not happy about it – to the point where the President can’t count on majority support for this from his own party.  You know, that sounds familiar: I wonder if Barack Obama remembers the Dubai Ports matter?  I further wonder if he realizes that he’s currently in the middle of the equivalent to that unhappy time in American domestic politics.

Moe Lane (more…)

Aug
15
2010
2

“All Star.”

All Star, Smash Mouth

Apropos of nothing, I liked that movie in spite of itself.

Aug
15
2010
1

Book of the Week: World War Z.

I’m going with World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War mostly because I’m re-reading for some reason; I’m not entirely certain why. It’s certainly worth re-reading, but there was no particular triggering event that caused me to take it off the shelf. Odd.

But I’ve not forgotten The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression.

Aug
15
2010
1

#rsrh Skeletons in Rangel *primary* challenger’s closet?

I say ‘primary’ because the likely Republican candidate – Rev. Michel Faulkner – in NY-15 does not, to the best of my knowledge, has a DUI arrest and two rape accusations hanging over him.  This would make him different from, say, Adam Clayton Powell IV, who is the likely primary challenger (H/T: Instapundit) to Rep. Charlie Rangel; and before anyone complains, it will readily be conceded that Powell was convicted of a lesser charge on the DUI situation.  It will even be readily conceded that the then 41-year old Powell claimed that the two sexual encounters (one of which was with his 19-year old intern) were consensual, and that neither woman (including the one with his 19-year old intern) followed through with pressing rape charges.

Again, I readily concede this.  Sure.  Adam Powell IV only drives almost drunk and gets permission before he schtupps his barely-legal employees.  No worries there, right? (more…)

Site by Neil Stevens | Theme by TheBuckmaker.com