The rapidly-decaying Pakistan situation.

A quick review of the recent breakdown in Pakistani-American relations:

Last Saturday a NATO airstrike reportedly killed 24 Pakistani troops located in military bases on Pakistani soil. The exact details of the situation are still unknown: the Pakistanis are claiming that the assault was completely unprovoked, while (admittedly anonymous) Afghan sources claim that NATO troops were returning fire. Either way, the population of Pakistan is enraged – to the point where they’re burning the President in effigy* – and NATO forces are worried about our allies the Pakistanis taking this opportunity as an excuse to step up reprisal attacks on NATO troops in Afghanistan. Which, if true, would be even more offensive than the burning in effigy.

Now, I could write about domestic politics at this point; and I could also write about how this showdown may have been inevitable from the start. But the real, immediate point here is: one major piece of fallout from this incident is that critical NATO resupply convoys to Afghanistan have been stopped at the Pakistani border. The administration needs to make this clear that this is unacceptable. Because it is.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*They can just go ahead and stop that, by the way. Now.

3 thoughts on “The rapidly-decaying Pakistan situation.”

  1. This situation has been in the making for some time. Anytime two allies don’t trust each other, something will inevitably happen!

  2. When Bush was burned in effigy, it proved how the world hated Bush. When Obama is burned in effigy, it demonstrates how a certain group hates America. Or something.

  3. I like it how we went to being friends when Bush was in office, but now we are on the brink of becoming enemies under Obama. Just like in Afghanistan.

Comments are closed.