Nancy Pelosi retreating from insinuations of new dirt on Newt Gingrich.

For those who missed it:

I think that we can safely score this one as a win for Team Newt. Seriously, why did Nancy Pelosi not resign after 2010, again?

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*’Cruel;’ not ‘inaccurate.’


  • jetty says:

    We need more Pelosi in 2012 for the GOP to win overwhelming majorities in both Houses.

  • Catseye says:

    Moe it’s because she’s not that smart. She literally can’t see the handwriting on the wall that idiot Democrats “Need not Apply” they are going to have to be MUCH SMARTER in the future if they wish to survive.

  • lourae says:

    Miller’s description forever burned into my brain–she’s a ‘Bond villain–Pelosi Galore’.

  • qixlqatl says:

    Catseye, if they were “much smarter”, they wouldn’t be democrats…..

  • DaveP. says:

    THe big advantage of Conservatives is that LibDems live in a glass bubble: the atmosphere is entirely of their own making and the only things that reach their ears are the sounds that they make themseves. As a consequence, they have very little idea how badly their mouthings and posturings play outside of so-blue-it-hurts enclaves like upperclass SF and the MSM. Pelosi is a great example, so is Obama demanding Congress stay in session- jsut before he jets off on a 14-day Hawaiian vacation.

  • BigGator5 says:

    Moe, you should have gone with the:
    Joke, but your last bullet point was just as funny.

  • Beej says:

    I think she was just reminded by her colleagues that the appropriate way to use the dirt is with anonymous leaks to the press.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Site by Neil Stevens | Theme by