The implication that a ‘flying death robot context’ is BAD.

I mean, I understand the attraction of a Tacocopter, although it’s obviously fake – and it’s obviously impossible to do in today’s regulatory climate, the implications of which is something that I suspect that the creator of the Tacocopter remote flying drone / taco delivery system concept has not really thought out all the way through.  But, dammit, it’s 2012.  There are no food pills, flying cars, Moon bases, laser pistols, AIs, and/or cyborg assassins.

Fine.

But, dammit, we could have flying death robots.  So give me flying death robots, damn your eyes.

One thought on “The implication that a ‘flying death robot context’ is BAD.”

Comments are closed.