(H/T: Hot Air Headlines) Or nephews. Nieces. Second cousins. Doesn’t matter, really: surely there’s a small child or two in Ricks’ life that he’d hate to see turned into an infantryman… what’s that? Yes, “infantryman:” because Ricks’ attempt to gussy up a moral-equivalent-of-war-forced-government-expansion in the form of a ‘draft’ WILL NOT FLY. If we bring back the draft – and may we never do – it will be a draft without deferments, without college exemptions, without National Guard sanctuaries… everybody goes, everybody fights. And if you have a true moral objection to war, well, the front lines can always use more stretcher details.
Sorry, but I have two kids. If they want to serve their country, I will be proud of them. But forcing them to spend three or four years enabling Thomas E. Ricks’ institutionalized need to pretend that expanding the role of government is morally equivalent to combat duty is not serving the country. Particularly since I’m not entirely certain that Ricks is entirely down with the idea that wars, once entered, need to be won… whether or not you agreed with the war in the first place*.
PS: This isn’t the first time this fool has pinged the radar on this issue, by the way. My offer still stands.
*We will now pause while someone on the Left inadvertently reveals his or her true feelings about the United States of America by coming up with a suitably Horrible Example of a war that the USA shouldn’t win. Assuming that said Lefty does not simply invoke Iraq, no doubt in the belief that Kurds and Marsh Arabs quite enjoy direct applications of nerve gas and napalm.