Sep
09
2012

#rsrh The sentence that, when omitted, instantly sabotages liberal complaints against Obama.

Latest example here: Maureen Dowd, of course.  Anyway, the sentence?

…And that’s why I won’t vote for Obama this time.

It doesn’t matter how angry a liberal is, how betrayed, and/or how aggrieved. If a liberal is all of those things and still pulls the lever for Barack Obama, then Obama doesn’t really care – and he probably shouldn’t, either.  Why waste the emotional energy involved?

Moe Lane

 

3 Comments

  • Mija 'acat' Cat says:

    ‘s an exercise in excuses … It’s not St. Barack’s fault!

    Mew

    (or marker-placing for post-loss ‘I-told-you-so’ ism

  • tnfriendofcoal101368 says:

    awww, has Maureen lost the tingles for Obama? Like most of her columns, Maureen Dowd is a waste of trees that were killed to print her pablum. My take is liberals like Maureen do realize Americans don’t re-elect Presidents who put them in unemployment and food stamp lines. No matter how many stories Politico writes sourced by “GOP insiders (Joe Scarborough) saying “Obama has won”. Maureen and the liberals like her want it to be Obama’s fault and not the fault of their asshatted policies.

  • Murgatroyd says:

    Did you read the comments on Dowd’s column? Jebus! Talk about “bitter clingers” …

RSS feed for comments on this post.


Site by Neil Stevens | Theme by TheBuckmaker.com