<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal appeals court nixes Obama&#8217;s recess appointments.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/</link>
	<description>I am an evil giraffe. Until then, will stick to patter songs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:03:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe_Lane</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222360</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What probably changed Roberts&#039; mind was that he figured out a way to rule that the damned mandate was a tax without also having to rule that the whole suite of lawsuits needed to be tossed out because nobody was harmed by said tax yet.  The above case actually does show just how reluctant the courts are to overturn legislative and executive branch decisions; they don&#039;t like the kinds of headaches they get when they do overturn them, particularly with the Awful Example of &lt;em&gt;Roe v. Wade&lt;/em&gt; looming over them*.

Frankly, we were lucky to get the &lt;em&gt;Kommerz Klawz Roolz Awl&lt;/em&gt; argument gut-shot once and for all.

*I think that it was &lt;strong&gt;Sotomayor&lt;/strong&gt; who said recently that RvW has been making the court&#039;s life miserable for decades.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What probably changed Roberts&#8217; mind was that he figured out a way to rule that the damned mandate was a tax without also having to rule that the whole suite of lawsuits needed to be tossed out because nobody was harmed by said tax yet.  The above case actually does show just how reluctant the courts are to overturn legislative and executive branch decisions; they don&#8217;t like the kinds of headaches they get when they do overturn them, particularly with the Awful Example of <em>Roe v. Wade</em> looming over them*.</p>
<p>Frankly, we were lucky to get the <em>Kommerz Klawz Roolz Awl</em> argument gut-shot once and for all.</p>
<p>*I think that it was <strong>Sotomayor</strong> who said recently that RvW has been making the court&#8217;s life miserable for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herp McDerp</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222353</link>
		<dc:creator>Herp McDerp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;... I think Occam would conclude the simpler explanation is that Roberts recognized if he threw out Obamacare, he’d be putting the court in the crosshairs of the Obama administration..&lt;/i&gt;
 &#160;
Quite possibly ... but the Supreme Court &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;IS&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; in the crosshairs of the administration, and it will be until President Obama can appoint reliable &quot;progressives&quot; to fill any vacancies created by by Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, or Kennedy.
 &#160;
They &lt;i&gt;had&lt;/i&gt; it, and then &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt; made Roberts change his mind. I think there was more behind his flip-flop than concern for the Court&#039;s reputation ... and whatever it was, I suspect it was nasty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230; I think Occam would conclude the simpler explanation is that Roberts recognized if he threw out Obamacare, he’d be putting the court in the crosshairs of the Obama administration..</i><br />
 &nbsp;<br />
Quite possibly &#8230; but the Supreme Court <i><b>IS</b></i> in the crosshairs of the administration, and it will be until President Obama can appoint reliable &#8220;progressives&#8221; to fill any vacancies created by by Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, or Kennedy.<br />
 &nbsp;<br />
They <i>had</i> it, and then <i>something</i> made Roberts change his mind. I think there was more behind his flip-flop than concern for the Court&#8217;s reputation &#8230; and whatever it was, I suspect it was nasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlgrey</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222331</link>
		<dc:creator>earlgrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t even look or listen to them.  So touching wouldn&#039;t be happening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t even look or listen to them.  So touching wouldn&#8217;t be happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acat</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222329</link>
		<dc:creator>acat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have considered that, Herp .. but I think Occam would conclude the simpler explanation is that Roberts recognized if he threw out Obamacare, he&#039;d be putting the court in the crosshairs of the Obama administration.. 
.
Roberts&#039; &quot;decision&quot; just postponed a decision on Obamacare .. it is a narrow ruling, it did not say the entire thing is good .. just that the penalty is a tax.  
.
As Hobby Lobby, Liberty University, Wheaton College, and others are busily proving, there&#039;s still plenty of other ways to blow it up, and at a point when Obama *can&#039;t* use his campaign to demonize the court.
.
When I consider what an out of control executive *and a neutered court* looks like .. I cringe.
.
Mew]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have considered that, Herp .. but I think Occam would conclude the simpler explanation is that Roberts recognized if he threw out Obamacare, he&#8217;d be putting the court in the crosshairs of the Obama administration..<br />
.<br />
Roberts&#8217; &#8220;decision&#8221; just postponed a decision on Obamacare .. it is a narrow ruling, it did not say the entire thing is good .. just that the penalty is a tax.<br />
.<br />
As Hobby Lobby, Liberty University, Wheaton College, and others are busily proving, there&#8217;s still plenty of other ways to blow it up, and at a point when Obama *can&#8217;t* use his campaign to demonize the court.<br />
.<br />
When I consider what an out of control executive *and a neutered court* looks like .. I cringe.<br />
.<br />
Mew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Appeals court rules Obama&#8217;s NLRB recess appointments unconstitutional UPDATED &#124; Fausta&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222323</link>
		<dc:creator>Appeals court rules Obama&#8217;s NLRB recess appointments unconstitutional UPDATED &#124; Fausta&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Driscoll: Moe Lane of Red State adds, “the short version is that if this gets upheld by the Supremes (and the thinking is that the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Driscoll: Moe Lane of Red State adds, “the short version is that if this gets upheld by the Supremes (and the thinking is that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acat</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222321</link>
		<dc:creator>acat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a look at the .. rogues gallery is being *kind* .. of Dems in D.C.
.
I ask, earlgrey .. would you touch *anything* that fell off Waxman or Frank or Boxer or Durbin or Feinstein without gloves, let alone put it into your mouth?
.
Cats drink milk, yes .. we also have *standards*.
.
Mew]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at the .. rogues gallery is being *kind* .. of Dems in D.C.<br />
.<br />
I ask, earlgrey .. would you touch *anything* that fell off Waxman or Frank or Boxer or Durbin or Feinstein without gloves, let alone put it into your mouth?<br />
.<br />
Cats drink milk, yes .. we also have *standards*.<br />
.<br />
Mew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acat</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222319</link>
		<dc:creator>acat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve occasionally picked Ginsberg and Breyer in sweasel&#039;s dead pool for a while now, Westcoast...
.
http://sweasel.com/archives/category/deadpool
.
I decline to wish either of those venomous, treasonous leaches *well*.
.
Mew]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve occasionally picked Ginsberg and Breyer in sweasel&#8217;s dead pool for a while now, Westcoast&#8230;<br />
.<br />
<a href="http://sweasel.com/archives/category/deadpool" rel="nofollow">http://sweasel.com/archives/category/deadpool</a><br />
.<br />
I decline to wish either of those venomous, treasonous leaches *well*.<br />
.<br />
Mew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlgrey</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222317</link>
		<dc:creator>earlgrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cats drink milk, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cats drink milk, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herp McDerp</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222316</link>
		<dc:creator>Herp McDerp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;The more the effects of Obamacare are revealed, the worse I think of Chief Justice Roberts and his absolutely wrong decision.&lt;/i&gt;
 &#160;
I still think that Roberts changed his decision as the result of some kind of Chicago Way pressure. It had Obama&#039;s &lt;i&gt;modus operandi&lt;/i&gt; of blackmailing or eliminating his opposition written all over it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The more the effects of Obamacare are revealed, the worse I think of Chief Justice Roberts and his absolutely wrong decision.</i><br />
 &nbsp;<br />
I still think that Roberts changed his decision as the result of some kind of Chicago Way pressure. It had Obama&#8217;s <i>modus operandi</i> of blackmailing or eliminating his opposition written all over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222315</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Nelson Muntz voice) HA ha!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Nelson Muntz voice) HA ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: westcoastpatriette</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222314</link>
		<dc:creator>westcoastpatriette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, kitty, put your claws back in and purr for a while.  Just enjoy this ruling against the Obama regime for now.  It is truly worth purring over.:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, kitty, put your claws back in and purr for a while.  Just enjoy this ruling against the Obama regime for now.  It is truly worth purring over.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigGator5</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2013/01/25/recess-appointments/comment-page-1/#comment-222313</link>
		<dc:creator>BigGator5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=69643#comment-222313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/25/appeals-court-unanimously-rebukes-obama-on-recess-appointments/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hot Air&lt;/a&gt;, recess appointments may &quot;all but disappear&quot; thanks to Obama&#039;s overreach.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/25/appeals-court-unanimously-rebukes-obama-on-recess-appointments/" rel="nofollow">Hot Air</a>, recess appointments may &#8220;all but disappear&#8221; thanks to Obama&#8217;s overreach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
