On the merits of fear as a motivator, part 2.

As usual, Jim Geraghty is thinking along the same lines that I am.

The usual suspects will argue that this result is one more sign of the decline of the Tea Party. But this continues the chaotic classification system, in which all a candidate needs to be considered the “Tea Party” candidate in the narrative is to say, “Hi, I’m the Tea Party candidate.” Tillis is hardly a squish, and 59 percent of self-identified Tea Party supporters felt positively about Tillis; 24 percent felt unfavorably.

A more accurate interpretation is that “Establishment” candidates – read, those who have actually been elected to office before – are getting better at adapting to a political environment shaped by “Tea Party” supporters and making the case that they will indeed fight for conservative reforms.

I am frankly just going to be happy when all of the primaries are over. They’re getting in the way of me trying to make Democratic politicians’ lives miserable.

Moe Lane

One thought on “On the merits of fear as a motivator, part 2.”

  1. Evidence against this proposition: Mike Simpson.
    (Also: Most of the leadership in both houses.)

Comments are closed.