Staten Island Advance endorses… Michael Grimm (R, New York-11).

Why then, this is Hell: nor is the Staten Island Advance out of it.

There are, on occasion, electoral races in which both candidates are of high quality and high integrity and conduct a tough but fair campaign about the issues.

Fair-minded voters have a difficult choice, but they can know that, no matter who is elected, they’ll be well represented by someone who won’t embarrass their community.

The election for the House of Representatives seat in the 11th New York Congressional District is nothing like that.

Continue reading Staten Island Advance endorses… Michael Grimm (R, New York-11).

Quote of the Day, Even The Bad News Is A Win For Me edition.

Sean Trende consults the entrails

We’ll either see a heavy, last-minute break for Republicans, resulting in a wave, as undecided voters decide to cast their votes as a referendum on the president, or these voters will opt to stay home, the electorate will be made more heavily Democratic, and the Republicans will be left somewhat disappointed.

…and oh, the implications of ‘somewhat disappointed.’ ‘Somewhat disappointed,’ in this context, is us not netting more than six or seven seats in the Senate.  Which is to say: we flip the Senate, and remove four Democratic incumbents (Begich, Landrieu, Pryor, & Udall would be the short list, here) from office.  And that will put the kibosh on that stupid talking point Republicans can’t beat incumbent Democrats once, and for all*.

I’ll take that.  And, of course, flipping the Senate/throwing all those suddenly-surplus Democratic staffers out on the streets.

Moe Lane

*A factoid that has been help immeasurably by the fact that Democrats have been good about ‘convincing’ their Dead Men Walking to retire.  Unfortunately, the problem with telling your people that you’re bulletproof is that there’s a nontrivial chance that your people might start believing you.  This can be awkward when they base their defensive strategy on what was essentially a magic spell…

Rep. Eliot Engel (D, New York) now futilely regrets the Obamabargain his party made.

The grownups in the Democratic party – oh, yes, there’s one or two – are starting to get tired of having to deal with a White House that always messes up, and never learns.

Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, hit the Obama administration on Wednesday over an official calling the Israeli prime minister a “chickensh[*]t.”

“I was shocked and disappointed on reading the comments in The Atlantic,” Engel said in a statement. “I call upon the Administration to reassert the importance of the relationship between the United States and Israel, and to reaffirm that the bonds between our two countries are unbreakable.”

Continue reading Rep. Eliot Engel (D, New York) now futilely regrets the Obamabargain his party made.

Tweet of the Day, We Have Not Seen The Last Of Jenny Sanford edition.

This is a very interesting campaign ad…

Continue reading Tweet of the Day, We Have Not Seen The Last Of Jenny Sanford edition.

Quote of the Day, Arguing About The Things That Matter edition.

Jonah Goldberg:

As a proud member of the “don’t just do something, sit there” school of politics, I don’t fret much about partisanship and gridlock. Partisanship and gridlock aren’t bugs of our constitutional system, they’re features. And while everyone likes to see their preferred policies sail through Congress, on the whole I think we’ve been well served by those features for two centuries.

That said, in the spirit of compromise so lacking in Washington, I would like to offer a suggestion for how to fix the alleged dysfunction in Washington: Let’s have more partisanship about ideas and less about process.

I will raise a cheer for process-related partisanship – I find merit in the Republican party’s history, even when it was not unabashedly conservative* – but Jonah raised some interesting points. Read, as they say, the whole thing.

Moe Lane

*The GOP has always fallen back to embracing liberty.  From the Civil War to civil rights to killing the Soviet Empire, once and for bloody all. And if that meant using the government to do it, well… there is still music in the sound of a shackle broken, and clattering to the ground.

Independent, NAMED sources: Mary Burke fired from family business for incompetence.

Come, I will conceal nothing from you: when I heard that Mary Burke had been essentially accused of being a nepotism-loving nincompoop who had to be fired from her father’s company (Trek Bicycle Corp) because she couldn’t hack the family business, I… shrugged.  The original story had one named source – former Trek HR director Gary Ellerman, who is now the chairman of the Jefferson County Republican Party – and a couple of anonymous ones; and while the story certainly rang true you could make a legitimate case that the whole thing was just a partisan attack.  Well, OK, it is a partisan attack; which doesn’t make it false, but does make the whole thing arguable.

But then stuff happened.  First off, this: Continue reading Independent, NAMED sources: Mary Burke fired from family business for incompetence.

Democrats: Danged if they do embrace Obama, danged if they don’t.

David Axelrod:

“I’ve always believed that it’s not an effective strategy to run against a president of your own party, unless you’ve been actively opposed to that president,” said David Axelrod, who was Obama’s top political strategist in his two presidential campaigns and a senior adviser in his White House. “You’re going to get tagged with it anyway.”

Particularly when running against said President is in direct contradiction to your own voting history.

[A] new issue of Congressional Quarterly brings fresh evidence that Senate Democrats have maintained a tight formation behind the president, even as his approval ratings have sunk. It analyzed the 120 Senate votes on which Obama has urged a “yes” or “no” this year, and found that the most vulnerable Democrats stood behind him a minimum of 96 percent of the time.

You end up pleasing nobody.

So. Parenting question.

Let’s say your youngest kid is home from school because of the usual arcane school scheduling system.  Being conscientious, you have of course dressed the child in fresh clothing.  However, some time in the middle of the morning you look up to discover that the child has quietly changed himself back into pajamas.

You open your mouth, and… shrug, and close your mouth.

Is this bad parenting, or awesome parenting?  I could see it either way.