Feb
11
2015

Gov. Bruce Rauner (R, Illinois) is… actually going to go to war with the unions.

I may have to reassess my opinion of the nature of Illinois politics: perhaps somebody actually can achieve statewide office there without also being fully-tied into the Illinois Combine.  New Republican governor Bruce Rauner apparently wants to have a brawl: “Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner struck a first official blow on Monday against the public sector labor unions he has frequently criticized by ordering an end to a requirement that workers pay dues even if they decide not to join a union.” It’s an executive order, not legislation: because – like Barack Obama – Bruce Rauner has a pen and a phone, and is apparently unafraid to use either.  He also has a budget crisis that’s fueled in no small part by the inability of public sector unions to not be quite so greedy, which is one reason why we’re seeing this reform now.

Put another way… Eric Zorn of the Chicago Tribune is bitter, but accurate enough*: “Rauner’s order isn’t animated by empathy or some fastidious concern with constitutional fine points. It’s animated by a desire to put public employee unions into a death spiral, which will ultimately shrink the state’s payroll.” This, of course, is not exactly bad news to anybody who despises public employee unions, which are indeed kind of abominations unto the Lord – but I suppose that the Chicago Tribune might feel differently, given that the Tribune is fully-tied into the Illinois Combine. 

Zorn also notes that Governor Rauner’s gambit here was prompted by a favorable decision in Harris v. Quinn, which is another one of those time-delayed Roberts Court 5-4 specials that blow up in progressive faces so amusingly. Patrick Brennan over at NRO also touched on Harris v. Quinn, and also noted that there is a California case involving teachers’ union forced dues that is even now wending its way to the Supreme Court.  Gov. Rauner has already started up the legal process, apparently to get the case before the Supreme Court as quickly as possible.  It’ll be interesting to see how that plays out.

All of which obscures another point: nice to have a governor of Illinois that does things that we like, huh? I mean, I was happy to help to toss out Pat Quinn before he did something to get indicted over. Part of my duties as a citizen. But, hey, I get a meaningful attempt at shrinking government from the new guy, too! – For Illinois, that’s [bleeping] golden.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

6 Comments

  • Darin_H says:

    Wow. Going to listen carefully the next time I see him walking on TV, might hear the brass clanging…

  • Mikey NTH says:

    Not just shrink the state’s payroll, but shrink the state Democrat Party’s fundraising machine, the campaign donations (kickbacks) the public sector unions hand out. Oh and to also curb their “volunteer” campaign workers who show up to work the polls and campaigns because the unions kind of insist on that.

    What Walker did in Wisconsin knocked a very big prop out from under the state Democrats there, and I bet a lot of Republicans were paying attention.

  • acat says:

    Cat is cautiously optimistic re. Rauner. Early days yet, though.
    .
    My general expectation is that Rauner is somewhere between Christie and Walker .. Christie is only NY Gov because the Dems want to blame cuts on a non-Dem, Walker is WI Gov because the citizens of WI want there to be larger cuts…
    .
    I do feel it’s necessary to correct one thing .. the Chicago Tribune is not *wholly* owned by the Combine .. although they are far less independent than anyone’s willing to admit.
    .
    Mew

  • bcochran1981 says:

    Burn them to the ground. To. The. Ground.

    I despise unions period, let alone public unions. Having the lives of family members threatened and your business vandalized will have that effect.

RSS feed for comments on this post.



Site by Neil Stevens | Theme by TheBuckmaker.com