May
08
2015

Obama judicial appointee Mary Helen Murguia put Elton Simpson back on the street.

Let’s unpack this.

[FBI Director James] Comey said that [Elton] Simpson was first placed under FBI watch since 2006, when the agency first learned the Phoenix-area man wanted to join al-Shabab, the al Qaeda-linked group in Somalia. Simpson was ultimately indicted on terrorism charges and convicted, but due to questions over the government’s case, he never went to prison and was sentenced to probation. The FBI officially closed its case into Simpson last year.

As in, let’s look at the timeline.

  • 2006.  Elton Simpson comes under investigation “based on his ties with an individual “whom the FBI believed was attempting to set up a terrorist cell in Arizona,” according to court documents.”
  • 2007-2009: Simpson tells an informant for the FBI that he wanted to go to Somalia, presumably for the purposes of committing acts of terrorism. The feds ask him about this; Simpson denied that he ever said anything of the sort.
  • 2010: Since this could be easily proved to be a lie, Simpson was indicted and convicted for pretty much that charge (of course it’s a crime to lie to the government*).
  • 2011: And then… Elton Simpson was given probation and fined.  Judge Mary Helen Murguia – who is, by the way, both a Clinton (US District Court, Arizona) AND an Obama (9th Circus… ah, ‘Circuit’) appointee, decided that talking about jihad, vocally supporting jihad abroad, openly showing admiration for the imposition of sharia law, and then lying about his desire to go to Somalia – which at the time was in the news for, you guessed it, Islamist jihad – was not enough to justify more than three years of probation and a $500 fine.
  • 2012-2014: Elton Simpson spends his probation reaching out to ISIS.
  • 2015: Elton Simpson and an accomplice get shot in a Garland, Texas parking lot while trying to burst into a room full of people and murder them all.

Brilliant, Judge Mary Helen Murguia. Absolutely brilliant.  And it’s our domestic counter-terrorism strategy in a nutshell: which is to say, it gets worse and worse, the farther into the Obama administration that we go.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

PS: I guess that this means that Justice Murguia will no longer be considered for the next Supreme Court vacancy that crops up.  Which would be a pity, really.  Watching her squirm while trying to explain this particular court decision of hers would be entertaining, in its way.

PPS: Actually, if I was going to engage in character assassination I’d be bringing up Justice Murguia’s sister.  Who is almost certainly one of the reasons why you aren’t hearing all that much about Mary Helen Murguia.

*Yes, I know, that phrase raises the hackles of a lot of people. It’s still pretty obvious that a government would be both interested in making it illegal for people to lie to it, and possessed of the power to make such a thing illegal. Hey, the world was this way when I found it, OK?

5 Comments

  • Jeff Weimer says:

    It’s not character assassination to note that her sister, Janet, is the President of La Raza.

  • tomiathon says:

    RE: your PS: God send that she’s not under consideration for the next Supreme Court vacancy because that vacancy occurs under a Republican president

    • acat says:

      There is no such thing as a permanent majority.
      .
      There will be another Dem POTUS, and judge Murguia will likely still be on the bench .. we need to remember, eh?
      .
      Mew

      • tomiathon says:

        yes, but she’ll be 55 years old this year, and if a republican wins the white house in 2016 and serves just one term, she’ll be 60 by the time a democrat might appoint a new justice, which is likely too old for consideration.

        this does of course assume that Buzzy Ginsburg doesn’t retire this year, but despite all the pressure she’ll undoubtedly face from leftwing vultures to step aside and let Barky replace her, she seems set on leaving the bench feet first. so good health to you, Justice Ginsburg.

  • sicsemperstolidissimum says:

    Re: Illegality of lying to government
    .
    Legal system makes it illegal to lie to it. At least, I think perjury is a crime.
    .
    Government has a choice of treating all communication with the public as testimony, none of it, or a complicated system of picking and choosing.

RSS feed for comments on this post.



Site by Neil Stevens | Theme by TheBuckmaker.com