So apparently the opposition to a 20 week abortion ban is about the MONEY.

I assume that you have all been horrified by this, with this being Planned Parenthood’s ‎Senior Director for Medical Services Dr. Deborah Nucatola inadvertently confessing to organlegging and homicide. ‘Organlegging,’ for those unfamiliar with the concept, is where you sell people’s organs for money… which is blatantly illegal in this country, whether adult or (in this case)  the unborn*.  Dr. Nucatola also blithely confessed to performing partial-birth abortions, which are also illegal – and a felony. You can watch the whole thing here:

…particularly if you are any sort of law enforcement personnel. And, just when I thought that I couldn’t be more disgusted by this story, comes this honestly chilling observation from a RedState commenter.

Now we see why they are so vehemently opposed to 20 week abortion bans: it doesn’t give the involuntary organ donor enough time to grow. Monsters.

…Which would handily explain why Planned Parenthood fights the twenty-week ban, despite the fact that it has such broad support, yes?  We all thought that it was based on some sort of twisted principle.  Turns out it’s just that you can make a decent hunk of change off of harvesting baby parts. No sense just throwing out that money with the rest of the… stuff… right, Dr. Deborah Nucatola?

One last note: state and federal politicians, take note. This will be an issue. If given the opportunity, those politicians will be asked hard questions about this, with the cameras running. And the questions will include What steps have you taken to start a criminal investigation of these alleged crimes? if I have anything at all to say about it.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*Pro-abortion apologists will undoubtedly clutch at the suggestion that baby harvesting is covered after all under a set of dubious interpretations of the laws, in much the same way that a damned soul burning in a Hellish lake of fire will clutch at anything that looks like it might offer temporary surcease. I am frankly comfortable with letting those people try to defend the deliberate use of forbidden procedures in order to maximize the revenue to be gotten from vivisecting unborn babies. Makes my job so much easier, really.

28 thoughts on “So apparently the opposition to a 20 week abortion ban is about the MONEY.”

  1. Someone needs to do a Planned Parenthood version of that wall poster that tells butchers which part of the cow is which cut of beef.

    1. I can see the propaganda value of that, to drive the point home, but the idea makes me sick to my stomach. I need to get home and hug my kids…

  2. Alinsky’s rules: picket in front of their houses. Make sure the neighbors know.

    1. … this is pretty much why you can’t find an abortion clinic in the deep south .. shunning is a *remarkably* effective tactic.
      .
      Mew

      1. PP could afford to build more clinics in the Deep South. They could afford to bring their clinics up to a decent health standard. But PP isn’t interested in building a bunch of clinics in Rural or Suburban America. They’re isn’t enough black people in those places so its not worth the *cost*
        And PP ain’t interested in doing anything that might affect their profit margin.

        1. Note, yes you read that right, I am calling PP an inherently racist organization. Sue me.

        2. …. I have no idea what part of “the Deep South” you are talking about “without enough black people” in it.
          .
          That’s … just wow.
          .
          Would you care to re-phrase?
          .
          Mew

          1. Suppose PP is a deliberately genocidal organization. If so, it would make sense for them to set up where they have access to minorities at the cheapest cost in money and political influence. Id Est, cities in Blue States. There are minorities to murder in the rural deep south, but the locals would object too much for it to be cost effective.
            .
            This is how I read his statement.

          2. That reading does make sense, sicsemper, however that’s not conclusive .. many cost-of-living estimates say the southern cities are much, much cheaper places to live and work ..
            .
            Or, put another way, my point above – shunning works – is correct?
            .
            Mew

          3. If one is running a predatory organlegging operation disguised as a medical practice, avoiding discovery has got to be a major cost of business.
            .
            The money it’d take to raise standards of care from Gosnell to what would pass regulatory scrutiny in, say, Texas is probably a lot. The additional bribes and blackmail to cover Gosnell’s operation seem to have been heavily discounted by existing city and state corruption by leftist Democrats. Outside of Austin and other leftist or Democratic hellholes, comparable bribery would probably be prohibitively costly in Texas.
            .
            a) I’m not convinced that there is any disagreement between your statement on shunning and midwestconservative’s statement. The second seems an expansion of the first.
            b) How much money can there be in infant sized organs anyway? It seems like they would have to go into kids. Kids may have a higher rate of life threatening organ issues, but they are a smaller fraction of the overall population.

  3. Forgive my bluntness, but what difference will this make? You could have PP setting up billboards that brag about how they harvest the organs of unborn children and the instant someone in power makes noises about going after them, the Democrats and the usual suspects in Hollywood will shriek “War on women!” And then PP’s coffers will overflow with money again.
    .
    (Disclaimer: My personal opinion on what should be done to this person would have Moe breaking out the banhammer on me.)

    1. A future GOP President can use this to investigate PP, when ( not if) wrongdoing is found RICO can confiscate any additional funds PP would receive (via War on Women donations)
      I don’t know what the Statute of Limitations is for this particular crime, but I doubt its less then 18 months.

      1. Given that this could fall under the definition of murder (Not a lawyer), there is no statute of limitations.

        1. Sadly, Kennedy would oppose the death penalty in this case.
          .
          Were I not concerned for my immortal soul, I would like to revel in a bit of poetic justice.

  4. One mildly funny thing in all of this: The Democrats were just busy slamming Scott Walker for cutting Planned Parenthood funding. Walker’s way of making the Left continually open doors into their faces amuses me.

    1. And that’s what I most look forward to about a Walker Presidency – he seems to have a knack for pissing off the right people at the right time.

      1. Pissing them off isn’t hard …
        .
        Tearing away their veil of normalcy and showing them to the world, as they really are .. that’s Walker’s gift.
        .
        At least, in my opinion.
        .
        Mew
        .
        .
        .
        .
        WI Dem legislators shown as cowards who fled to Illinois
        .
        Protesters shown as thugs and vandals.
        .
        Dem labor voters shown as corrupt blowhards with no real teeth.
        .
        “John Doe” star chamber revealed as, well, a star chamber in the worst sense, with possible ties to IRS corruption.

  5. I like the use of “organlegging”, props for that. I would point out the Greenie aspect as well – “recycling”.
    .
    Mew

  6. I actually find this comforting.
    .
    Sometime before the age of ten, I put together what adults were saying about no-fault divorce, free love, and so forth, and came up with Jeff Dahmer.
    .
    If people are supporting these policies for profit, it is less frightening that what I assumed to be the case.
    .
    People who commit crimes because of how they are sexually wired are hard to detect, and difficult to persuade or force to stop.
    .
    People who commit crimes for money will generally stop once there is no longer any money in it.

  7. This is Hell come to earth. Much more disturbing than the Iran nuck deal. God will have no mercy on us if we do not end this abomination.

  8. What is truly disturbing is that this is apparently legal. This harkens back to the time when Bush cuts funding to fetal tissue stem cell research because he asked and was assured that the current (at the time) sample size was sufficient for the continuing research.

    Using adult stem cell is always a better solution (your own body is less likely to reject itself), but to the abortionist, they MUST have the sacred harvest organ from the innocents.

Comments are closed.