Trump campaign contemplating having the shakeup they should have had in January.

What we have here is a good news / bad news situation, and the funny thing is: they’re both the same news. CNN is hearing a whisper of a rumor of a suggestion of a possibility that the Trump campaign may be about to consider doing a major shakeup of their campaign. It’s obvious why that would be bad news: I’m perfectly happy with Trump’s strategy as it is. It’s also obvious why that would be good news: they should have done it last Tuesday. Not talked about it, or laying the groundwork for talking about it; they should have gone and done it. Rip off the band-aid quick, that’s my motto.

But will it work? Maybe, maybe not. But one thing that’s not in that article that should be: either way, it’s gonna be expensive. Quality costs

One thought on “Trump campaign contemplating having the shakeup they should have had in January.”

  1. Apologies in advance, but .. while quality costs, with the race now down from .. was it 17? .. to three .. a “moneyball” team becomes possible.
    .
    Now, whether Trump has both the money and the balls to put together such a team .. that’s an open question.
    .
    Mew

Comments are closed.