I’d pay good money to see that, you know.
There's a lot to love about the Satanists being whiny little bitches b/c their statue was used in a TV show, but easily the funniest part is where they claim that ANY religion would sue over this kind of thing and then every Catholic reading that died from laughter https://t.co/JljtcT6awJ
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) November 24, 2018
Because if we’re going to be talking about intellectual property violations, the Satanists are at the top of the list when it comes to ripping off Catholic iconography. Although I suppose that they may have branched out by now. I wouldn’t know; the appeal of using religion as a mechanism for generating shock value crested for me when I was, I don’t know, about twelve or so.
Although this reminds me of an old In Nomine write-up of mine…
Do the Vatican attack lawyers wear priestly or judicial robes?
When they’re acting as lawyers, one would assume priestly robes or Armani. There are standards to uphold, after all.
.
When they’re acting as judges .. one would assume cardinals’ robes at least .. with Armani underneath.
.
Mew
.
p.s. Given how many films have been shot in and around Rome, where you can’t go 10 feet without tripping over *something* religious, I find the satanists’ objections laughable .. and suggest they grow a thicker hide.
So it goes with gag-religions founded on cynical petulance: they’re on their way to becoming as respected as, say, Scientology.