<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Moe Lane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moelane.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moelane.com</link>
	<description>I am an evil giraffe. Up far too early, though.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>#rsrh (CPAC) Hey, I have a keyboard again!</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/09/rsrh-cpac-hey-i-have-a-keyboard-again/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/09/rsrh-cpac-hey-i-have-a-keyboard-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not unrelated to the fact that Blogger&#8217;s Row is filling up; I eventually found somebody with a charger with the right power connection. We got a lot of New Media folks here today. And folks running for office: I&#8217;m hoping for a good number of candidate and politician interviews. Already got Richard Mourdock, who&#8217;s in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not unrelated to the fact that Blogger&#8217;s Row is filling up; I eventually found somebody with a charger with the right power connection.</p>
<p>We got a lot of New Media folks here today.  And folks running for office: I&#8217;m hoping for a good number of candidate and politician interviews.  Already got <a href="http://richardmourdock.com/">Richard Mourdock</a>, who&#8217;s in the middle of a primary run for Senate in Indiana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/09/rsrh-cpac-hey-i-have-a-keyboard-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#rsrh Now here at CPAC&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/09/rsrh-now-here-at-cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/09/rsrh-now-here-at-cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And if you are here and you happen to have an iPad with a Logitech keyboard with you PLEASE stop by Blogger&#8217;s Row; I did not bring a charger for my keyboard and I am even now screen-typing. More seriously, we&#8217;re hoping to get a bunch of interviews out of this, as usual.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you are here and you happen to have an iPad with a Logitech keyboard with you PLEASE stop by Blogger&#8217;s Row; I did not bring a charger for my keyboard and I am even now screen-typing. </p>
<p>More seriously, we&#8217;re hoping to get a bunch of interviews out of this, as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/09/rsrh-now-here-at-cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Rock the Casbah.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/rock-the-casbah-2/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/rock-the-casbah-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not-politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock the casbah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the clash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rock The Casbah, The Clash &#160; I think that it was James Lileks who argued that bands like the Clash killed the Seventies dead, dead, DEAD.  If so&#8230; thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="500" height="375" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U4HPdWYwgyw?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><a id="static_txt_preview" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00137G9UO/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=webloglicenti-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00137G9UO" target="_blank">Rock The Casbah</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/entity/The-Clash/B000APF3RK/digital/?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=webloglicenti-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;sn=d" target="_blank">The Clash</a><img src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=webloglicenti-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I think that it was James Lileks who argued that bands like the Clash killed the Seventies dead, dead, DEAD.  If so&#8230; thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/rock-the-casbah-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SHOOT THE MOUNTAIN LION, DAMN IT.</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/shoot-the-mountain-lion-damn-it/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/shoot-the-mountain-lion-damn-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not-politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHOOT THE MOUNTAIN LION]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SHOOT EVERY MOUNTAIN LION THAT STRAYS WITHIN AN AREA INHABITED BY HUMANS. TAN THE SKINS, STUFF THE HEADS, AND MOUNT BOTH IN PROMINENT PLACES.  THE MOUNTAIN LIONS WILL GET THE POINT VERY DAMNED QUICKLY. THIS IS NOT A DIFFICULT CONCEPT TO GRASP. MOE LANE PS: VIA INSTAPUNDIT.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/williamson/mountain-lion-snatches-leander-boy-in-big-bend-2157840.html#.TzKP54_ueZk.email">SHOOT EVERY MOUNTAIN LION</a> THAT STRAYS WITHIN AN AREA INHABITED BY HUMANS. TAN THE SKINS, STUFF THE HEADS, AND MOUNT BOTH IN PROMINENT PLACES.  THE MOUNTAIN LIONS WILL GET THE POINT VERY DAMNED QUICKLY.</p>
<p>THIS IS NOT A DIFFICULT CONCEPT TO GRASP.</p>
<p>MOE LANE</p>
<p>PS: VIA <a href="http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/136815/">INSTAPUNDIT</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/shoot-the-mountain-lion-damn-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed &#8216;Pelosi Provision&#8217; of the STOCK Act unveiled yesterday.</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/proposed-pelosi-provision-of-the-stock-act-unveiled-yesterday/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/proposed-pelosi-provision-of-the-stock-act-unveiled-yesterday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The STOCK Act &#8211; which is short for the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act; honestly, I wish that they&#8217;d stop coming up with cute names for these.  This particular one is not really obnoxious, but some of them have really reached for the acronym &#8211; started to get really pushed through last year, once [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The STOCK Act &#8211; which is short for the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act; honestly, I wish that they&#8217;d stop coming up with cute names for these.  This particular one is not really obnoxious, but some of them have really reached for the acronym &#8211; started to get really pushed through last year, once it came out that Members of Congress, including then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57323527/congress-trading-stock-on-inside-information/?tag=cbsContent;cbsCarousel">were profiting unduly from legal insider trading*</a>.  I call it &#8216;legal&#8217; not in the sense that there was nothing wrong with said insider trading; I call it &#8216;legal&#8217; because Congress exempted itself from the rules that the rest of us have to follow. The distinction is important.  It&#8217;s perfectly legal for, say, Senator Dianne Feinstein to <a href="http://biggovernment.com/whall/2011/11/15/sen-feinstein-loaded-up-on-biotech-stock-just-before-company-received-24-million-govt-grant/">buy into a biostock company</a> just before the company picks up a fat government subsidy check, even if she knew about it ahead of time.  <strong>That&#8217;s the problem</strong>.</p>
<p>Anyway, one of the more egregious things being done &#8211; again, involving then-Speaker Pelosi in at least one case &#8211; was the practice of offering Members of Congress a favorable position from which to buy into an IPO.  Pelosi in particular used this practice <a href="http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2011/11/15/who-invited-nancy-pelosi-and-her-husband-to-buy-visas-ipo/">to buy into a Visa IPO</a>, right before credit card legislation that hampered Visa g<a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/11/14/how-visa-courted-nancy-pelosi-hoping-to-forestall-swipe-fee-changes.html">ot somehow sidetracked in Congress for a year</a>; she ended up making a killing on the (again, &#8216;LEGAL&#8217;) deal.  And, naturally, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/1007-other/209209-gop-to-push-pelosi-provision-for-stock-act">the amendment</a> that would ban this practice in the future has been named the &#8216;Pelosi Provision&#8217; by Republicans.  By all accounts, the former Speaker is unhappy about this; I am uncertain whether or not that she is as unhappy about this as I am that the woman made several million unfortunately-legal dollars off of her former position to manipulate and delay legislation, but I somehow doubt it.<span id="more-35642"></span></p>
<p>The bill is largely expected to pass, by the way: the real fireworks will be in conference.  If the thing gets defanged, it will be there &#8211; so keep an eye out for that particular problem.  It wouldn&#8217;t be the first time that a troublesomely reformist piece of legislation got revised out of existence, while out of camera range&#8230;</p>
<p>Moe Lane (<a href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2012/02/08/proposed-pelosi-provision-of-the-stock-act-unveiled-yesterday/">crosspost</a>)</p>
<p>PS: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72624.html">Politico reports</a> that the STOCK Act&#8217;s original sponsors Louise Slaughter and Tim Walz are unhappy that the Republican majority has taken away their bill and are now busily reshaping it.  Alas for Rep. Slaughter, it&#8217;s not exactly Eric Cantor&#8217;s fault that she was incapable of getting it passed in the first place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/proposed-pelosi-provision-of-the-stock-act-unveiled-yesterday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#rsrh I haven&#8217;t seen the Eastwood commercial&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/rsrh-i-havent-seen-the-eastwood-commercial/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/rsrh-i-havent-seen-the-eastwood-commercial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reason.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;but it can&#8217;t be better than this parody of it. Personally, I&#8217;m getting tired of the cowardice of politicians.  Particularly when it comes to dealing with sour market conditions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but it can&#8217;t be better than <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2012/02/07/halftime-in-america-remy-chrysler-ad-par">this parody of it</a>.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-j_8qCbHsUA?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m getting tired of the cowardice of politicians.  Particularly when it comes to dealing with sour market conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/rsrh-i-havent-seen-the-eastwood-commercial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahoma Democratic state senator attempts to ban masturbation.</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/oklahoma-democratic-state-senator-attempts-to-ban-masturbation/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/oklahoma-democratic-state-senator-attempts-to-ban-masturbation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constance johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanny state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oklahoma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gotta love the nanny state, huh? Yes, I know that state Senator Constance Johnson thought that she was merely making a point about abortion.  That&#8217;s because she&#8217;s not very bright.  Very many people can tell the quantitative difference between a gamete and a zygote &#8211; even if they have to look up the words in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/08/life_begins_at_ejaculation.html">Gotta love the nanny state, huh</a>?</p>
<p>Yes, I know that state Senator Constance Johnson thought that she was merely making a point about abortion.  That&#8217;s because she&#8217;s not very <strong>bright</strong>.  Very many people can tell the <em>quantitative</em> difference between a gamete and a zygote &#8211; even if they have to look up the words in the dictionary &#8211; and many of <em>those</em> people will not be amused at being lectured to like this.  Probably best for her to pretend that she meant it that way all along.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that this will make it hard for Sen. Johnson to rise further from her current position as state senator, except that Oklahoma Democrats are finding it quite hard enough to get ahead as it is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/oklahoma-democratic-state-senator-attempts-to-ban-masturbation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#rsrh Drinking the Old Grey Lady&#8217;s tears on Super PACs&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/rsrh-drinking-the-grey-ladys-tears-on-super-pacs/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/rsrh-drinking-the-grey-ladys-tears-on-super-pacs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super pacs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;personally, I don&#8217;t find the system nearly as &#8216;corrupt&#8217; or &#8216;pollut[ed]&#8216; as the New York Times seems to &#8211; unless, of course, we&#8217;re simply taking both terms to be semantically equivalent to &#8216;got rid of legislators that the NYT liked&#8217; &#8211; but in its way that just makes all the better this bitter, despondent, let-me-swig-more-rotgut-and-pound-the-typewriter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;personally, I don&#8217;t find the system nearly as &#8216;corrupt&#8217; or &#8216;pollut[ed]&#8216; as the New York Times seems to &#8211; unless, of course, we&#8217;re simply taking both terms to be semantically equivalent to &#8216;got rid of legislators that the NYT liked&#8217; &#8211; but in its way that just makes all the better this bitter, despondent, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/08/opinion/another-2012-campaign-for-sale.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all">let-me-swig-more-rotgut-and-pound-the-typewriter screed</a> about how Obama&#8217;s going to use those eeeeeeeeeeeevil Super PACS in his campaign.  I mean it, too.  Watching the anonymous author come to terms with the fact that he or she was deliberately and callously lied to will warm your insides.</p>
<p>Mind you, the author will still vote for Obama in November. Which is why I&#8217;m so contemptuous: don&#8217;t expect respect from me if you can&#8217;t even respect yourself&#8230;</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/02/08/bad-news-nyt-pretty-bummed-about-obamas-flip-flop-on-super-pacs/">Hot Air Headlines</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/rsrh-drinking-the-grey-ladys-tears-on-super-pacs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230;Well, *this* was nastier than I intended it to be.</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/well-this-was-nastier-than-i-intended-it-to-be/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/well-this-was-nastier-than-i-intended-it-to-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jonathan last]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt yglesias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d change it, except that I think that it&#8217;s also true. I think that Jonathan Last is misunderstanding Matthew Yglesias&#8217; interests, here (the short version: the latter seems to think that American cities only had one newspaper apiece in the old days, and the former is mocking the latter in response).  The Yglesias &#8216;brand&#8217; has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em>I&#8217;d change it, except that I think that it&#8217;s also <strong>true</strong>.</em></p>
<p>I think that <a href="http://jonathanlast.com/2012/02/07/hipster-economists/">Jonathan Last</a> is misunderstanding <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/02/07/partisan_media_an_economic_analysis.html">Matthew Yglesias&#8217;</a> interests, here (the short version: the latter seems to think that American cities only had one newspaper apiece in the old days, and the former is mocking the latter in response).  The Yglesias &#8216;brand&#8217; has always been &#8216;precocious youngster;&#8217; which is easy enough to do when you&#8217;re a kid blogging from Harvard, but considerably harder when you&#8217;re a thirtysomething, fairly doctrinaire liberal who has had all the interesting bits burned away after spending several years in Establishment Left &#8216;journalist&#8217; knocking-shops*. So, there&#8217;s not exactly a reason to avoid being sloppy: the occasional dumb mistake is perfect for simulating that fresh-faced look, no?</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m not saying that Yglesias <em>deliberately</em> got it wrong about how many American cities had multiple newspapers in the Good Old Days; I&#8217;m merely saying that he&#8217;s got no real pressing economic reason to do the necessary research.</p>
<p>Moe Lane</p>
<p>*Look it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/well-this-was-nastier-than-i-intended-it-to-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The self-correcting conservative Democratic liar problem.</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/the-self-correcting-conservative-democratic-liar-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/the-self-correcting-conservative-democratic-liar-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unicorns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s Morning Jolt Jim Geraghty observed, while implicitly dismissing former (involuntarily) Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper&#8217;s (D, PA) sudden getting religion over Obamacare for the cynical political move that it probably is, that the myth of the conservative Democratic Congressman was, well, a myth &#8211; and that he&#8217;s been saying that since 2010.  Well, I&#8217;ve been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today&#8217;s Morning Jolt Jim Geraghty observed, while implicitly dismissing former (involuntarily) Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper&#8217;s (D, PA) <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dem-rep-kathy-dahlkemper-i-wouldnt-have-voted-obamacare-if-id-known-about-hhs-regulation_626302.html">sudden getting religion over Obamacare</a> for the <a href="http://ace.mu.nu/archives/326515.php">cynical political move</a> that it probably is, that the myth of the conservative Democratic Congressman was, well, a myth &#8211; and that he&#8217;s been saying that <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/4763/there-no-such-thing-conservative-democrat">since 2010</a>.  Well, I&#8217;ve been saying that, too &#8211; so I decided to look at all the examples of so-called conservative Democrats found in that article, and where they are no.  The results were amazingly gratifying:</p>
<ul>
<li><del>Bart Gordon</del> (forced to retire, 2010)<br />
<del></del></li>
<li><del>Bobby Bright</del> (removed, 2010)<br />
<del></del></li>
<li><del>Dan Boren</del> (cutting and running, 2012)<br />
<del></del></li>
<li><del>Gene Taylor</del> (removed, 2010)<br />
<del></del></li>
<li><del>Heath Shuler</del> (cutting and running, 2012)<br />
<del></del></li>
<li><del>Joe Donnelly</del> (switching out to lose Senate race, 2012)</li>
<li>John Barrow (going out fighting [cruelly redistricted], 2012)<br />
<del></del></li>
<li><del>S.H. Sandlin</del> (removed, 2010)<br />
<del></del></li>
<li><del>Walt Minnick</del> (removed, 2010)</li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-35635"></span></p>
<p>In other words, it turns out that they really <strong>are</strong> a myth, now.  It used to be that they were a myth because you couldn&#8217;t count on them to vote conservative when it counted; now they&#8217;re a myth because it&#8217;s getting harder and harder to find them in their supposed natural habitat.  Which is a shame, but then nobody forced them to keep supporting a party leadership that pretty much hates everything that conservative Democrats supposedly stand for&#8230;</p>
<p>Moe Lane (<a href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2012/02/08/the-self-correcting-conservative-democratic-liar-problem/">crosspost</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/08/the-self-correcting-conservative-democratic-liar-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#rsrh How many dead Mexicans would it have taken for Eric Holder to fire people?</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/07/how-many-dead-mexicans-would-it-have-taken-for-eric-holder-to-fire-people/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/07/how-many-dead-mexicans-would-it-have-taken-for-eric-holder-to-fire-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operation fast & furious]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been meaning to ask this question for a while about Operation Fast &#38; Furious. Because apparently the number was higher than 200; so I was just curious about how many dead Mexicans are functionally equivalent to one Obama appointee&#8217;s career.  Three hundred? Four hundred? An even thousand? Or is the answer &#8220;Don&#8217;t bother asking?&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to ask this question for a while about Operation Fast &amp; Furious. Because apparently the number was <a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/09/20/attorney_general_in_mexico_200_murders_result_of_operation_fast_and_furious">higher than 200</a>; so I was just curious about how many dead Mexicans are functionally equivalent to one Obama appointee&#8217;s career.  Three hundred? Four hundred? An even thousand?</p>
<p>Or is the answer &#8220;Don&#8217;t bother asking?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/07/how-many-dead-mexicans-would-it-have-taken-for-eric-holder-to-fire-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama dangerously skips out early on Alfalfa Club dinner.</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2012/02/07/barack-obama-dangerously-skips-out-early-on-alfalfa-club-dinner/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2012/02/07/barack-obama-dangerously-skips-out-early-on-alfalfa-club-dinner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alfalfa club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=35605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am speaking pseudo-medically, here. The entire article by Albert Hunt is possibly a bit too snide about various Republicans, but this part is at least on-point about Obama&#8217;s behavior at the annual Alfalfa Club dinner: Obama hates such dinners. Some of his aides, in particular his political adviser David Plouffe, urged him not to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em>I am speaking pseudo-medically, here.</em></p>
<p>The entire article by Albert Hunt is possibly a bit too snide about various Republicans, but this part is at least on-point about Obama&#8217;s behavior at the annual <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2012-02-05/team-obama-shows-dangerous-penchant-for-hubris-albert-r-hunt.html">Alfalfa Club dinner</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama hates such dinners. Some of his aides, in particular his political adviser David Plouffe, urged him not to spend an evening mingling with the 1 percent. Yet he chose to go, and attendees said it was the first time they could recall a speaker leaving before the other side had its fun. In addition, Obama’s 87-year-old predecessor was present.</p>
<p>Imagine the criticism five years ago if President George W. Bush had walked out on a dinner before Hillary Clinton spoke, with Bill Clinton in the audience.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-35605"></span>But that would in fact not have happened, because George W. Bush is in fact smarter than Barack Obama.  Particularly when it comes to assessing the long-term personality damage that can result when you&#8217;re the most powerful man on the planet &#8211; and you never, ever let yourself forget that.  Not that I&#8217;m suggesting that President Obama&#8217;s mind is going to snap like a rubber band under the strain.  Merely that he&#8217;s already taken a job that is visibly aging him&#8230; and, in his case, probably burning spare lifespan as well.  These institutions exist for a <strong>reason</strong>, believe it or not&#8230;</p>
<p>Via Jim Geraghty&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/290340/be-sure-tip-your-gunrunner">Morning Jolt</a>.</p>
<p>Moe Lane (<a href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2012/02/07/barack-obama-dangerously-skips-out-early-on-alfalfa-club-dinner/">crosspost</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2012/02/07/barack-obama-dangerously-skips-out-early-on-alfalfa-club-dinner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.704 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 10:56:10 -->

