#rsrh Hey, want to drink Glenns Greenwalds’ pain?

The parts where they’re impotently fulminating about the way America deeply mourned Ronald Reagan’s passing is danged tasty stuff.  But not as tasty as the way that Glenns are incredibly bitter about the fact that even Christopher Hitchens’ enemies – of which the man had a plethora, across the political spectrum – are willing to admit that Hitch had his points.  Which Hitch did: the man (who I never met) could be absolutely maddening at times, but he was never, ever dull.

Unlike, say, Glenns Greenwalds.  Seriously, there’s a reason why I only ever link to them when they’re loudly screaming in petulant agony.

Moe Lane

#rsrh QotD, Richard Dawkins Is Kind Of Mixed-Up Inside, Huh? Edition.

Look, I really do have nothing against atheists.  But when you write something like this:

“Christopher Hitchens, finest orator of our time, fellow horseman, valiant fighter against all tyrants including God,” fellow atheist and author Richard Dawkins tweeted.

…you have to understand: you’re not exactly swaying me to your position.  For that matter: you’re not really persuading me of your atheism, either.  Seriously, I look at that and I can easily conclude that Richard Dawkins believes in God even more strongly than I do: he just hates His guts.

Via @allahpundit.

Moe Lane

PS: I hope Hitch got through it OK.