I wonder whether this suit thing Obama’s dealing with might actually have legs.

I didn’t think that it would, but check out the casual cruelty of Esquire.

I’ve been dealing with Barack Obama’s constant and comprehensive litany of failure for going on six years now. This is the first time that I’ve seen Esquire treat the President like he was just like any other schlub with no sense of taste: which is to say, roughly, and with a casual indifference to how it made Obama feel. It’s… kind of refreshing, really. Although I don’t think that Obama’s going to feel the same way, what with the way he’s been treated as a God-King since 2007…

#rsrh I got two comments on this neo-Fascist paean…

…that Esquire put out about the President, and how he’s so dreamy.  Well, three: the first is that I don’t actively blame President Obama for people writing embarrassingly man-crush-tastic pieces about him, I still judge the guy for encouraging the practice.  Seriously, dude: you’re the President of the United States. You don’t need other people to keep defining your inner value for you, you know what I mean?

Anyway, the other two points:

  1. If you read that piece and started going, God help our educational system, breathe easier: this author is Canada’s problem, not ours.
  2. I felt that the photo to the article lacked something:

There.  Fixed.

Moe Lane Continue reading #rsrh I got two comments on this neo-Fascist paean…