<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Moe Lane &#187; john cornyn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moelane.com/tag/john-cornyn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moelane.com</link>
	<description>I am an evil giraffe. Up far too early, though.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Holder admits differences between F&amp;F, OWR.</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2011/11/10/eric-holder-admits-differences-between-ff-owr/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2011/11/10/eric-holder-admits-differences-between-ff-owr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batfe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast and furious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john cornyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operation wide receiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=33166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via Instapundit) For those needing background: &#8220;F&#038;F&#8221; is Operation Fast &#038; Furious, which is an Obama-era operation in which guns were actively allowed to cross over the border (without any attempt to track them) and illegally resold to Mexican narco-terrorists, without the permission (or even the awareness) of the Mexican government. &#8220;OWR&#8221; is Operation Wide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/131333/">Instapundit</a>) For those needing background: &#8220;F&#038;F&#8221; is Operation Fast &#038; Furious, which is an Obama-era operation in which guns were actively allowed to cross over the border (without any attempt to track them) and illegally resold to Mexican narco-terrorists, without the permission (or even the awareness) of the Mexican government.  &#8220;OWR&#8221; is Operation Wide Receiver, which was a Bush-era operation where rather less guns were allowed to cross over the border to be resold to Mexican narco-terrorists; in stark contrast, the government did atttempt to track the guns and did keep the Mexican government in the loop.  Despite this, Democratic partisans have attempted to paint these two operations as identical.</p>
<p>This gambit has now been neatly scuppered, thanks to <a href="http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/11/09/sen-john-cornyn-makes-ag-holder-squash-fast-and-furious-bush-did-it-too-argument/">Senator John Cornyn&#8217;s</a> (R, TX) getting Attorney General Holder on the record about this, once and for all.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="375"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bESZcRMCBKk?version=3&#038;feature=oembed"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bESZcRMCBKk?version=3&#038;feature=oembed" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="375" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><span id="more-33166"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-st-louis/under-oath-holder-discredits-bush-did-it-too-excuse-for-gunwalker">See more here</a>: the relevant portion of that video is where Cornyn makes Holder admit the differences  mentioned above &#8211; and, more importantly, deny that he (and, by implication, the government) wanted to equate the two operations.  I know that Sen. Cornyn may not be on every conservative activist&#8217;s Christmas Card list, but getting Holder on the record like this makes a lot of our lives easier: from this moment on, trying to play Bush-did-it on F&#038;F/OWR puts the person trying that particular spin in direct opposition to sworn government testimony under oath.  That&#8217;s very useful, and Cornyn should be commended for getting that right for us.</p>
<p>Moe Lane (<a href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2011/11/10/eric-holder-admits-differences-between-ff-owr/">crosspost</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2011/11/10/eric-holder-admits-differences-between-ff-owr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#rsrh Schrodinger&#8217;s Greene (D CAND, SC-SEN)</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2010/08/15/rsrh-schrodingers-greene-d-cand-sc-sen/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2010/08/15/rsrh-schrodingers-greene-d-cand-sc-sen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alvin greene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huffington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john cornyn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=23531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via Hot Air Headlines) The Huffington Post is highly upset (but hiding it fairly well) that Sen John Cornyn of the NRSC is happily using the awkwardness that is the Alvin Greene candidacy for pushback against the Left&#8217;s peculiar notion that the Democratic party is somehow the mainstream one of the two in American politics.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=96443">Hot Air Headlines</a>) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/15/john-cornyn-jumps-on-alvi_n_682507.html">The Huffington Post</a> is highly upset (but hiding it fairly well) that Sen John Cornyn of the <a href="http://www.nrsc.org/">NRSC</a> is happily using the awkwardness that is the Alvin Greene candidacy for pushback against the Left&#8217;s peculiar notion that the Democratic party is somehow the mainstream one of the two in American politics.  Normally, I wouldn&#8217;t care overmuch for how much this upsets the HuffPo; but it&#8217;s funny to see a website so discombobulated that it can&#8217;t even keep track of its own argument.  To wit:</p>
<blockquote><p>And yet, the unemployed veteran &#8212; who never did any formal campaigning &#8212; has been<strong> <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/07/26/alvin-greene-gets-most-media-attention/" target="_hplink">the most covered candidate</a></strong> of any running for office this cycle.</p>
<p>[snip]</p>
<p>And to the extent that  voters are not aware of how odd both he and his campaign truly are, the  impression can be left that it is a<strong> high-profile Democrat</strong> (not some  mysterious eccentric) whose skeletons are being dragged out of the  closet.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bolding mine, in both places.  It&#8217;s one or the other, HuffPo.  You can&#8217;t complain about Alvin Greene being the subject of massive media attention and then pretend that the voters aren&#8217;t then going to be aware of the&#8230; unique nature&#8230; of who Sen Cornyn&#8217;s talking about.  OK, fine, you <em>can</em>, but it just won&#8217;t <em>work</em>.</p>
<p>Unfair?  Since when did the Huffington Post care about <em>fairness</em>?  As I like to say: Karma.  It&#8217;s what&#8217;s for dinner.</p>
<p>Moe Lane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2010/08/15/rsrh-schrodingers-greene-d-cand-sc-sen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So we give Michael Williams a few months of incumbency as Senator.</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2009/05/15/so-we-give-michael-williams-a-few-months-of-incumbency-as-senator/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2009/05/15/so-we-give-michael-williams-a-few-months-of-incumbency-as-senator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john cornyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Bailey Hutchison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=4678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is bad? Sen. John Cornyn is worried that Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison is going to retire early this fall to run for Governor, but I&#8217;m missing the problem here (via Political Wire): &#8220;My guess,&#8221; he told Texas reporters at his Senate office today, is that Hutchison will resign &#8220;this fall sometime.&#8221; That would allow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em>This is <strong>bad</strong>?</em></p>
<p>Sen. John Cornyn is worried that Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison is going to retire early this fall to run for Governor, <a href="http://blogs.chron.com/txpotomac/2009/05/cornyn_expects_hutchison_resig_1.html">but I&#8217;m missing the problem here</a> (via <a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/05/14/cornyn_expects_hutchison_resignation_this_fall.html">Political Wire</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;My guess,&#8221; he told Texas reporters at his Senate office today, is that Hutchison will resign &#8220;this fall sometime.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would allow Perry to appoint an interim senator and allow a special election to take place in May 2010 instead of this November (which would happen if she resigned this spring or summer).</p></blockquote>
<p>It seems pretty simple:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hutchison resigns.</li>
<li>Governor Perry appoints Texas Railroad Commissioner* <a href="http://www.williamsfortexas.com/">Michael Williams</a> to be interim Senator.</li>
<li>Williams wins the special election.</li>
</ul>
<p>Come on, Senator Cornyn.  This isn&#8217;t exactly rocket science.</p>
<p>Moe Lane<span id="more-4678"></span></p>
<p>*An elected position in Texas that actually oversees energy issues (gotta love agenda drift, huh?); Michael Williams has been elected to the position three times, and there are Republicans all over Texas who are jumping up and down at the prospect of getting to vote for him for Senator.  Here&#8217;s some footage of him from the last convention:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/M73Bts3I6Bs&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M73Bts3I6Bs&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
<p>&#8230;and from the Texas Convention:</p>
<p><object width="360" height="255" data="http://blip.tv/play/jHS84WCHyUo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="src" value="http://blip.tv/play/jHS84WCHyUo" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object><br />
<em><br />
Crossposted to <a href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/05/15/so-we-give-michael-williams-a-few-months-of-incumbency-as-senator/">RedState</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2009/05/15/so-we-give-michael-williams-a-few-months-of-incumbency-as-senator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

