Top 20 SF films?

(Via Nodwick) On the one hand, the movies on this list that I’ve actually seen:

Pitch Black
Star Trek
Spider-Man 2
The Incredibles
28 Days Later
Iron Man
The Dark Knight
District 9
Serenity

…are all excellent (in particular, Pitch Black making the cut pleased me). On the other hand, the omission of Cloverfield in favor of (pick your obscure film here) seems a bit raw.  On the gripping hand, I’m hearing that Avatar kind of sucks as anything except partisan agitprop.

Moe Lane

For all your further ‘Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octupus’ star needs.

If you’re like me, you have been waiting for this day – the day that Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus came out, direct-to-video – for two years*. You have, of course, pre-ordered it – but what happens once it’s arrived, and you’ve watched it six times? What will you do then?

Why, you’ll go pick up some of the other works that the stars and director have done, of course. Continue reading For all your further ‘Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octupus’ star needs.

Changeling? I don’t suppose that an actual one is involved…

…no, probably not.

Anyway, Ace of Ace of Spades HQ has an interesting review up – OK, he has two interesting reviews up, but I’m working under the assumption that I’ll see Doubt more or less by accident* – of Changeling, which looks like it just came out. Ace liked it a lot, but it clearly lacks the exploding starships and/or gun fu that I normally associate with Good Movies; anybody else who saw it have an opinion?

Moe Lane

*I assume that what will happen is that it’ll be on or about to be on, somewhere, just as I’m wandering by; and then I’ll watch it. And then I’ll agree that it was a good film, and that I enjoyed it.

My Little Pony… the movie.

You’d watch this.

Admit it.

My Little Pony.

Personally, I think that Allahpundit’s being too disapproving of this sort of thing. Hollywood makes movies like what this one is satirizing because people want to see them. A lot. And while they may pay for movies that Hollywood wants to make and nobody wants to watch, they also pay for movies that not enough people want to watch. I mean, I liked Bottle Shock; but no way was that movie coming out if Hollywood couldn’t pay the bills.

Just saying.

$750 million lawsuit filed against Marvel Entertainment.

Guess it’s settled whether there’s money in that franchise, huh?

According to the Associated Press, a lawsuit was filed yesterday in a Manhattan federal court on behalf of four shareholders of Stan Lee Media, Inc. against Stan Lee, his partner Arthur Lieberman, his wife Joan Clayton, Marvel Entertainment, Inc. and producer Avi Arad. The four unnamed shareholders are seeking more then $750 million in profits from films based on Marvel characters, including “Spider-Man,” “X-Men” and “Iron Man.”

While details are still trickling in regarding specifics to the case, the AP reports that the lawsuit claims profits from Lee’s comic creations belong to the company after emerging from bankruptcy in 2006. The suit claims Lee and the others named in the proceedings ignored the company and shareholder’s interests.

I came across this while looking up Watchmen info – see Moe succumb to the Fanboy side of the Force! Succumb, Moe, succumb! – and while I figure that this will probably get settled it’s still a little interesting. I mean, sure, between the Spiderman movies and the X-Men films and the entire Iron Manmy-God-it’s-full-of-Tony-Starks” thing Marvel must be a hot commodity right now. Still, 750 million’s nothing to sneeze at – even if they’re hoping to “only” score a 100 million or so.

Moe Lane

PS: Watchmen comes out in March; Star Trek’s still up for May.  And I don’t know what’s going to be the big summer must-see movies, yet.