Today’s Happy Monkey Public Service Announcement.

Please remember: this is not a happy monkey.

This is a monkey that is debating whether or n0t to savagely bite you.  Generally speaking, the answer defaults to ‘yes.’  Monkeys are not particularly introspective when it comes to biting things.

This is a happy monkey:

…you can tell that by the details that teeth are not visible; and the hand is full of a stolen camera, instead of, say, monkey feces. Continue reading Today’s Happy Monkey Public Service Announcement.

Breaking: White House to fight release of detainee photos.

As Jim Geraghty notes, all of Obama’s promises come with an expiration date. All of them.

Obama Opposes Releasing Photos of U.S. Detainee Abuse
President Obama has decided not to release photos which the Pentagon had planned to released by May 28 in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

President Obama has decided not to release hundreds of photos potentially showing U.S. military personnel abusing prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on New York City and the Pentagon.

A senior administration official told FOX News that Obama met with his legal team last week and told them that he did not feel comfortable with the release of the photos because he believes they would endanger U.S. troops, and that the national security implications of such a release have not been fully presented to the court.

Last week.

President Obama Reverses Course on Releasing More Detainee Abuse Photographs

President Obama met with White House counsel Greg Craig and other members of the White House counsel team last week and told them that he had second thoughts about the decision to hand over photographs of detainee abuse to the ACLU, per a judge’s order, and had changed his mind.

The president “believes their release would endanger our troops,” a White House official says, adding that the president “believes that the national security implications of such a release have not been fully presented to the court.”

They decided this last week. One wonders why it took them this long to mention it. Even the usual “new polls came in” excuse won’t fly, this time: we knew Friday that the Democrats were losing the initiative in this argument.

All very odd.

Crossposted to RedState.

So, who is this Carrie PreJean ‘revelation’ aimed at, anyway?

I’m at a loss, here. If it’s aimed at social conservatives, surely the people doing learned last year that directing demoralization attacks at the caricature of ‘Christianists’ that lives mostly in your head only annoys the people that you’re caricaturing; if it’s aimed at the general populace, you’d think that it’d be explained why it’s contradictory to be both against same-sex marriage and being fine with being photographed in your knickers; and if it’s aimed at the Online Left, I don’t see what the point is.  She’s a good-looking woman with unacceptable ideas, so they hate her already, in that Special Time kind of way.

Or maybe I’m being too dismissive of that last possibility.  After all, now they have something a bit more tangible with which to indulge their fetish…

Crossposted to RedState.