<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Moe Lane &#187; white house press pool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moelane.com/tag/white-house-press-pool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moelane.com</link>
	<description>I am an evil giraffe. Up far too early, though.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:00:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>White House tries to muzzle media; draws back a bloody stump.</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2009/10/22/white-house-tries-to-muzzle-media-draws-back-a-bloody-stump/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2009/10/22/white-house-tries-to-muzzle-media-draws-back-a-bloody-stump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fnc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox news channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken feinberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on fox news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house press pool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=12914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tell me again how smart these people are. So this administration had what passes for a brainstorm among that group: now that they&#8217;ve made it clear that they disapprove of one particular news network, why, there would be nothing stopping them from stepping up their attempts to marginalize said network. So the White House announced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Tell me again how smart these people are.</em></p>
<p>So this administration had what passes for a brainstorm among that group: now that they&#8217;ve made it clear that they disapprove of one particular news network, why, there would be nothing stopping them from stepping up their attempts to marginalize said network.  So the White House announced today that a specific White House Press Pool access &#8211; Ken Feinberg, who is one of the myriad &#8216;czars&#8217; so beloved of this administration &#8211; would explicitly <strong>exclude</strong> Fox News.  Despite the fact that the Press Pool is supported in part by Fox News.</p>
<p><em>And the media refused to play along.</em><span id="more-12914"></span></p>
<p>This, oddly enough, has not been brought up by any of the <strong>other </strong>networks, so for right now the best source for this story is FNC (yes, savor the irony):</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BlMILRyDRdM&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BlMILRyDRdM&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>See <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/22/its-come-to-this-white-house-tries-to-bar-fox-news-from-interviewing-pay-czar/">Hot Air</a> and <a href="http://ace.mu.nu/archives/293930.php">AoSHQ</a> for more.  In this particular case, the news bureaus decided that the White House could make Feinberg available for all five news networks, or for <strong>none </strong>of them.  Whether or not this was due to principle or pragmatism (Hot Air leans towards the latter), it was the right answer: the administration caved in short order.  Hopefully there won&#8217;t be a need for multiple lessons.  I&#8217;m forced to admit that I&#8217;m pleasantly surprised at how well the news media handled this one.  Even if they <em>did</em> do it solely because they don&#8217;t want the precedent set.</p>
<p>Moving along: AoSHQ is amazed at this administration&#8217;s priorities.  For myself, I&#8217;m reminded again of a thought that I&#8217;ve had a few times.  When you look at this administration&#8217;s performance to date, it&#8217;s like the Democratic Party went out and found themselves a caricature of everything that they complained about/hated/feared with regard to George W Bush&#8230; only this time? It&#8217;s <em>all true</em>.</p>
<p>Moe Lane</p>
<p><em>Crossposted to <a href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/10/22/white-house-tries-to-muzzle-media-draws-back-a-bloody-stump/">RedState</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2009/10/22/white-house-tries-to-muzzle-media-draws-back-a-bloody-stump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

