<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Moe Lane &#187; with us or against us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moelane.com/tag/with-us-or-against-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moelane.com</link>
	<description>I am an evil giraffe. Also: Shawarma.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>John Brennan&#8217;s a little&#8230; touchy for his position, no?  #rsrh</title>
		<link>http://moelane.com/2010/02/09/john-brennans-a-little-touchy-for-his-position-no-rsrh/</link>
		<comments>http://moelane.com/2010/02/09/john-brennans-a-little-touchy-for-his-position-no-rsrh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moe_Lane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['with us or against us' is a misquote of what bush said]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al-qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miranda rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with us or against us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelane.com/?p=18306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was looking for fodder for a couple of light and fluffy posts, but I probably shouldn&#8217;t let this pass by without comment. In an oped in USA Today, John Brennan &#8212; Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism &#8212; responds to critics of the Obama administration&#8217;s counterterrorism [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking for fodder for a couple of light and fluffy posts, but I probably shouldn&#8217;t let <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/02/wh-some-critics-serving-the-goals-of-al-qaeda.html">this</a> pass by without comment.</p>
<blockquote><p>In an oped in USA Today, John Brennan &#8212; Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism &#8212; responds to critics of the Obama administration&#8217;s counterterrorism policies by saying &#8220;Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The title of the op-ed is &#8220;<a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/02/opposing-view-we-need-no-lectures.html?csp=34">We need no lectures</a>&#8221; &#8211; which, given the fact that this administration rather stupidly read a foreign terrorist his Miranda rights, and has been trying to wiggle out of the consequences of it ever since, is self-evidently <strong>not true</strong> &#8211; is ably enough pushed back on <a href="http://ace.mu.nu/archives/298049.php">here</a> and <a href="http://ace.mu.nu/archives/298053.php">here</a> by AoSHQ, so I&#8217;ll just repeat something that I&#8217;ve written before.  The oddity of the current administration is that it&#8217;s as if the Democrats went out and found somebody who was <em>just like</em> what they thought George W Bush was &#8211; only, in this case?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s <em>all true</em>.</p>
<p>Weird.</p>
<p>Moe Lane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moelane.com/2010/02/09/john-brennans-a-little-touchy-for-his-position-no-rsrh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

