Obama not leading in Gulf. And this was a *surprise*?

Do you know what is the fun part of these poor reviews of Obama’s Gulf performance?

[Chris] Matthews, speaking during an appearance with Jay Leno on NBC’s “Tonight Show,” said Obama’s response “scares me. He’s been acting a little like a Vatican Observer here. When is he actually going to do something?”

[James] Carville, one of the President Bush’s harshest critics in the wake of the 2005 hurricane that decimated New Orleans, called Obama’s response “lackadaisical.”

(Via Hot Air) It’s the confused outrage.  Matthews’ I can understand; the talking head is not after all expected to be observant.  But Carville’s usually not this dumb, so his befuddlement at the White House’s passivity is particularly enjoyable.

Let me explain.  The basic scenario that the Obama administration has visibly decided to give British Petroleum a free hand to muck about with capping its well, to the point where the state of Louisiana is pretty much screaming across the board and across the political spectrum.  There are some arguments that he’s doing it because BP was a major donor to Barack Obama, which could be even be true… but it’s more likely that Barack Obama is doing it this way is because passing the buck is the way that Barack Obama ‘solves’ problems.

Think about it for a second.  The ‘stimulus’ was shaped by the President allowing Congress to throw together a wish list of looting opportunities and calling it a job recovery program (didn’t work); the cap-and-trade bill was written by the very lobbyists that the administration was supposed to be regulating (it didn’t); and the health care monstrosity was an exercise in both poor oversight and poor regulation. In all cases the administration – whether through inexperience, laziness, incompetence, or a mix of all three – assigned to itself the easy task of mugging for the cameras while assuming that the grunt work would be done by… somebody.  And, indeed, somebody did do it; only, badly.

So if you’re surprised that the White House is doing the same thing with the Gulf mess, please do our country a favor and don’t be too loud about it.  We’re already dealing with steadily-eroding perceptions abroad of the USA’s collective intelligence; no sense in making it worse.

Moe Lane

Crossposted to RedState.

2 thoughts on “Obama not leading in Gulf. And this was a *surprise*?”

  1. There is one fairly major difference.

    If there’s anybody on the planet who knows how to cap a high-pressure oil gusher a mile deep in the ocean, we can pretty much guarantee that that individual does not work for the Government, let alone the Obama administration. It’s not just a matter of pay, although the bidding among BP, Exxon-Mobil, etc. would be brisk. BP employees don’t have to kowtow to superiors with seniority and degrees in Womyn’s Studies, nor file ten-page expense reports listing every stick of gum bought during the business trip, nor…

    If Obama, or anybody else in the Government, can stop the oil coming by issuing decrees, let them get at it. I’m quite sure that BP would lend them a boat that would get them in walking distance.


  2. Bammers doesn’t lead on ANYTHING. I don’t think he understands the difference between “leadership” and “dictatorship”.

Comments are closed.