I think that Daniel Foster over at NRO has a good point, here: a credible threat along those lines is going to force the Democrats to make a lot of concessions. I also think that the tenor of his comments section suggest that ‘credible threat’ is the compromise solution: there is a definite movement out there that embraces a point-blank opposition*. So, Democrats: you can deal with Senator Lindsey Graham; or you can deal with the people who think that Senator Graham is too squishy for words.
Which do you prefer?
*Doesn’t matter whether you agree with them or not. They’re there and they’re not going away. Deal with the world as it is, Democrats; not least because you guys are downright awful at redefining the world to suit you.