(Via @sissywillis) Fay Voshell, on how apparently the pro-choice movement is increasingly becoming comfortable with the (imported) practice of… sex-selective abortion, which in practice means ‘aborting female babies because they have less perceived worth than male ones:’
Feminists have embraced an ideological construct which declares loudly and clearly that any woman can decide that her unborn little girl is worth less than a little boy. They have gone along with the worst of third-world ethics, declaring female feticide a “choice” they can live with.
This issue has been of some concern to the pro-life community; as the links show, legislation to declare abortions based on race or gender issues as being violations of the Civil Rights Act has been introduced in the House. Judging from the rather hysterical (using “the frothing reaction” metric: there’s nothing funny about opposing the killing of Asian babies simply because they’re female) reaction from various suspects, it’s unlikely to make it through the Senate this go-round. Just one more thing for the ‘personally pro-life’ Democratic Senators out there to not take personally…
Moe Lane
This really doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me… You’d think that Feminists would want to have a female child over a male child.
They’re not really children, just masses of tissue. Or so the pro-choice people would have us believe. So we know they can’t think clearly!