Companies: you should not treat Tweeting as advertising.

When it comes to this article – We Got A Look Inside The 45-Day Planning Process That Goes Into Creating A Single Corporate Tweet – it’s hard to top Patrick Ruffini’s response.

But I’ll note this: Twitter is not actually a good place to advertise your product, unless of course you’re paying Twitter to insert your ads into people’s feeds (at least, the ones who aren’t using a Twitter platform that kills said ads on sight). Come right down to it: companies should not have Twitter feeds at all unless they have something legitimately interesting to say – and if there’s one thing that a 45 day planning process can accomplish, it’s the careful leaching out of anything interesting to say.

5 thoughts on “Companies: you should not treat Tweeting as advertising.”

  1. “Twitter is not actually a good place to advertise your product”. Is anywhere a good place any more?. If your target demographic spends all day staring at it, it’s pretty hard to resist. Also, I came here through a link to a tweet. You just successfully advertised your product on twitter.

    “….should not have Twitter feeds at all unless they have something legitimately interesting to say”

    Companies just need to learn to be interesting.

    “‏@ChesterCheetah A mind like a steel trap is great in theory. Until it catches a possum.”

    For some reason I found this tweet from Cheetos to be hilariously funny and earned them a follow. Now all the need is the occasional funny joke and they have my passing twitter attention. If that works as advertising is a whole ‘nother issue though, since I can’t say it’s going to make me buy any additional cheetos, but that’s more a general advertising problem than a specific twitter one.

    1. And thus you describe the challenge of a “brand” attempting to “build a relationship”.
      .
      Any “brand relationship” is always going to be synthetic, because one of the two “people” in the relationship is synthetic .. especially since a synthetic that gets *too* good at faking it enters the “uncanny valley”.
      .
      Mew
      .
      .
      .
      p.s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_Valley (to date, there is no XKCD for this ..)

      1. Depends. Steve Jackson Games pulls it off on Twitter very well.
        Of course, it’s a small business with only a few individuals putting out tweets. About what they’re doing as a business, find interesting, or just bad puns.

        1. Yes, but that’s not “synthetic” in the same way as Toyota or IBM or Google would be … You can have a one-to-many relationship with a cult…
          .
          Mew
          .
          .
          .
          p.s. Yes , I know they are not a cult, but working there is more of a secular “divine calling” than a job, though.

        2. I’m guessing that Steve Jackson Games doesn’t take 45 days to compose a tweet, either.

Comments are closed.