I like Bobby Jindal. He’s smart, thinks about policy, and he’s a good guy. If he gets the nomination, he’ll do a good job both running for, and being, President. As to whether I plan to vote for him in the Maryland primary? I dunno. I don’t know what my options will be, at that point. And, shoot, it might actually matter. Wouldn’t that be a change…
Moe Lane
PS: That’s it. No meta-analysis. At this moment I consider the polling results to be pretty much inherently flawed, across the board. I have no idea if Jindal can win, and probably nobody else does, either. Anybody who successfully predicts otherwise ahead of time will do it via simply guessing.
excellent. Jindal’s my 2nd choice after Walker. hopefully one or both will still be in it by the time primary season rolls into Texas
They’re both in my top 5, would be happy to support either.
.
I’d also like a Jindal/Walker ticket.
.
Mew
Meh, no worries. Every Republican beats every Democrat this cycle.
Gol-dang it, I’ve said it before and I’ll keep on saying it: Your dilemma highlights the self-destructive lunacy of the Republican winner-take-all primary system, which encourages fratricidal attacks between the potential candidates. Switch to approval voting, and not only does that crap go away, but you end up with the candidate who ha the broadest appeal.
But does the RNC listen to me? Nooooooooo …
And The Washington Post goes on the attack.
I despise polls. The moment they’re published, they’re bandwagon propaganda. The ones that people make decisions by are not published.
The good news is, the pollsters are getting worse at it.
.
I *suspect* a variant of Goodhart’s Law applies ..
.
Mew