Obama administration decides to permit children’s access to abortifacients.

Because apparently it’s not like Barack Obama’s reputation can be any lower among pro-lifers, anyway.

The Obama administration has decided to stop trying to block over-the-counter availability of the best-known morning-after contraceptive pill for all women and girls, a move fraught with political repercussions for President Obama.

The government’s decision means that any woman or girl will soon be able to walk into a drugstore and buy the pill, Plan B One-Step, without a prescription.

Mind you, the President is still personally hesitant about allowing eleven year old girls to dose themselves with drugs because they think that they might be pregnant, or because their ‘boyfriend’ wants them to be ‘safe,’ or because it’s a hot new trend*.  It’s just that Barack Obama feels as a matter of public policy the Republic will fall if Planned Parenthood is stymied in any way, shape or form.

You should have seen what comment I deleted.

Moe Lane

*Yeah, when I think of ‘consistently capable of making informed judgements’ I think ‘tween.’  That’s why we let them vote and work full time at 11, after all.

12 thoughts on “Obama administration decides to permit children’s access to abortifacients.”

  1. Don’t tell me, let me guess. If one of the first daughters comes home and says “I need the morning after pill”, both of the first parents will take one with her…
    (as always, the management has the right to kick this cat and his comments to the curb)

  2. The government’s decision means that any Statutory Rapist will soon be able to walk into a drugstore and buy the pill, Plan B One-Step, without anyone interfering with further rapes.

    1. As an added benefit, there is nothing to prevent the Noble Statutory Rapist from unknowing slipping these pills into the Rohypnol Cocktail he prepares for his Young True Love.

  3. Is the same dosage for a 150 lb 30 year old woman really the same for a 70 lb 14 year old? We don’t let 17 year olds get tattoo’s or go tanning or take aspirin in school without parental consent, what is it about killing babies that brings out the repressed libertarianism in liberals?

    1. Their altar must be washed with the blood of the innocent. In olden days they would have just thrown kids into a volcano, now they use abortion to fulfill the tribute

      1. The Palestinians who sacrificed their children to Ba’al did not have access to a volcano. They built fire pits in their temples. The deal still stands today: sacrifice your young and have a better life.

    2. ‘s not the killing babies, ‘s the sex-without-consequence.
      They never got over the 1960s.

  4. Oh Good! More female hormones into our water supply!


    Estrogen in Waterways Worse Than Thought

    Risk greater for disease, death and intersex traits

    Exposure to estrogen puts fish at greater risk of disease and premature death, according to a new federal study.

    The U.S. Geological Survey study showed that estrogen exposure reduces a fish’s ability to produce proteins that help it ward off disease and pointed to a possible link between the occurrence of INTERSEX FISH(!!!) and recent fish kills in the Potomac and Shenandoah rivers.

  5. So Liberals have an issue with more than 16oz of soda. They are ok with regulating every public-school meal. They have an issue with smoking/second-hand smoke. However they are ok with a 11-year-old girl buying the Morning After Pill (nevermind HOW SHE GOT THE MONEY) to help cover-up a rape crime. Gotcha.

      1. Yes, it’s quite refreshing to realize that before the large-scale consequences of this will be felt, we’ll likely be living through something like the years between Diocletian and Anastasius.

        If we’re lucky, the government will still let us pay taxes in dollars.

Comments are closed.