…since other sites are: do we need more primary debates? I certainly don’t want any more, given that at this point I can feel my IQ points ablate away with every new one. And I can’t imagine that any more of them will move the needle at this point.
I could, however, be wrong. Thoughts?
Not unless we get more candidates.
I believe you are correct. At this point, it’s like watching Potsie sing “Pump Your Blood” every week on Happy Days.
Only if they spend an hour and a half on the Justice Department and at least half of that on Fast and Furious.
We’ve not yet had a debate. Would be nice to have a few REAL ones.
Well, since you asked, lol.
Yes, I think we do. But we don’t need any more of these showbiz,National Enquirer level tabloid debates.
Fast and Furious, Agenda 21, energy loans gone crony, the size of government overall, the relevance of government’s size to liberty and property (as in taxes), the repealed provisions of ObamaCare (the 1099 and the CLASS).
What we need is a substantive debate. We have seen only 1 1/2 of that.
No. Not unless rational questions regarding Obama’s job performance (i.e.: Fast & Furious, Keystone XL, GM & Chrysler bailout, etc) are the ONLY things that are allowed to be referenced. Also, it must be hosted by known conservatives (Rush, Hannity, Medved, Erickson, etc.) No more nut job libs. Why are they allowed to **** up OUR primary process even more than we already do?
Mmmm… No.At least, not any that include a)Ron Paul and b) liberal moderators advancing their own agenda.
Guess that means no more debates.
Debates?
There were debates?
Gee. Well, the cats disconnected my TV some time in the summer of 2010, and the satellite subscription ran out about the same time, and I haven’t bothered correcting either “problem”, so I guess I’ve missed a lot. Debates, huh? Sounds dumb.
Regards,
Ric
No. Just…no.
Only if the “debates” are handled like Mike Huckabee has done on his show. I especially like the first one he did, where the candidates were questioned one at a time by three state attorneys general.
I’ll be contrary here and say yes, more debates. Preferably ones without a moderator where the candidates talk to each other directly.
Yes, Romney choosing to run away form a debate where he and Gingrich sit at a table and discuss the issues is most telling. Is he afraid of coming off as too Liberal or too Conservative?
No new debates until we get new candidates.
No more debates, at least in the manner in which they have been previously conducted. However, I am all in favor of “debates” that more resemble joint press conferences focusing on just how awful the Obama administration is. THAT I could get behind.
Not moderated by fluff media types. Now, you tell me there’s a debate moderated by someone on the RIGHT who will ask the questions we care about and push back on dumb answers…I’d support several of those.