Alternative title: Dick Trumka’s ego writes checks the AFL/CIO can’t cash. To summarize, the Hill article reports that Trumka is kind-of, sort-of threatening that if the Democratic party doesn’t pay more attention to Big Labor, then Big Labor will start thinking about going politically shopping elsewhere. This is an… interesting proposition, to be sure – given that Trumka does not exactly say where Big Labor was planning to go politically shopping.
I mean, obviously it’s not going to be the GOP. Our party loathes the public sector union leadership cadre that has been raiding the public treasury for decades; besides, those people are more reliably Democratic voters than even dead people are. As for private sector unions… well. There’s a sharp dividing line* there anyway. People below that line are actually not particularly going to lockstep their votes for the Democrats anyway; and people above it are bluffing. More to the point: everybody knows it.
So I suggest that Dick Trumka stop wasting his betters’ valuable time by making empty threats. His faction is a fully-owned subsidiary of the Democratic party’s rich, idle elite… and the Republican party doesn’t need any of his particular brand of sycophancy anyway. God knows we have enough of our own to suppress, and to keep suppressed, so why should we get involved in what is essentially a temper tantrum by the Democratic party’s subordinates?
Via @laborunionrpt.
Moe Lane (crosspost)
PS: Third party? Nah, our system is set up to keep third parties down, thank goodness. And, yes, that statement was written with a bit of malice aforethought.
*It might be impolitic for me to suggest that the line is made up of hookers and cocaine, or at least the ready availability of both to people above said line, so I shan’t make that suggestion.
I agree we don’t need the leadership of the Unions. The rank and file has been peeling away for years and the leadership can no longer rely on them and they KNOW IT. I was a Steward for a number of years, I know.
Time for a Reaganesque raid on the Rank and File. Pointing out that that union leadership is working for bigger government and social decline, not the best interests of the members or society at large is a great wedge strategy. Who cares how the union leadership tells the masses to vote, if they insist on thinking for themselves?