This is an interesting tweet…
I'd set the line on states won by Hillary Clinton in the primary at 49.5
— Nate Cohn (@Nate_Cohn) July 18, 2014
…mostly because I remember how inevitable Hillary Clinton was in 2006, too. Admittedly, the options have gotten worse since then – Barack Obama has had the same effect on future Democratic candidates that dioxin has on plants – but, still, it’s not like the woman is a great candidate. And if 2016 really does end up being a foreign policy election, then the Democrats would be better off nominating somebody with no record before they nominate someone with her record.
Only if no one else on the Dem side wants to be the sacrificial lamb for Walker’s Federal Throne of Skulls 2016 Edition….