It doesn’t mean anything, obviously. But it’s kind of funny. Some of the questions change significantly when you have kids…
4 thoughts on “Tweet of the Day, See? See? edition.”
Comments are closed.
It doesn’t mean anything, obviously. But it’s kind of funny. Some of the questions change significantly when you have kids…
Comments are closed.
?
“Page does not exist”
Am I missing the joke?
I’m gonna guess Moe Meant to link his results of the Moral Alignment Test:
I am 60% good, 47.5% lawful, making me lawful good:
https://idrlabs.com/moral-alignment/2/60/2/47.5/result.php
Following in his path, my results are:
You are 22.5% evil, 22.5% lawful, making you true neutral.
Are neutrals allowed here, Mr Goody Two Shoes?
True Neutral, 18.3% Chaos
Meh. Boring test. The author has presumptions that aren’t really defensible.
For example: if you’re from a culture that has shame, rather than guilt, as the negative behavioral pole, then the questions skew hard towards evil.
On the flipside, altruism is conflated with goodness, despite the negative second-order effects that result from confusing intent with outcome.
I was solidly lawful, with good tendencies that weren’t quite enough to kick me up across that line. Admittedly, that’s pretty accurate for who I am these days, at least if you’re judging good/evil based on how you treat strangers, rather than on how you treat those closest to you..