28 DAYS LATER was excellent. 28 WEEKS LATER was… an ambitious failure. I am very much a minority opinion in that assessment, I know, but I felt the movie did not sufficiently sell to me the contrived set of screw-ups that allowed the virus to propagate again. So I wasn’t enthralled at the thought of 28 YEARS LATER.
And yet: this doesn’t look half bad.
I also give a movie points for having the guts to use Rudyard Kipling in a trailer. And not in an obnoxiously snarky fashion, either. Nice.
Moe Lane
#commissionearned
Why do you think that’s the minority assessment?
I think it’s bloody well obvious.
Very nice use of Kipling.
Not sure I want to see another zombie flick. They’ve been done to death. (But they keep coming.)
Mostly because it got good reviews and made decent money at the box office. So I’d say that our opinion isn’t *wrong*, but I don’t think it’s *popular*. 🙂
Kipling has never been wrong, merely unfashionable.
We’d all be better off not caring about fashion.