Point (11:43 AM, Sarah Cliff):
Getting worked up into an increasingly heated health nerd rage about the Census changes. We’re losing our best data source on Obamacare.
— Sarah Kliff (@sarahkliff) April 15, 2014
Counter-point (12:21 PM, …Sarah Kliff): “Don’t freak out about the changes to the Census yet“.
Amazing how you’d never know about that tweet simply by reading the article, huh? Also: speaking professionally, if RedState told me to recant that strongly something that I wrote on Twitter I’d tell them “No” on my way out the door. Then again, RedState isn’t that sort of website. Not that I’m suggesting that Vox is that sort of website either, of course. Or that they keep their staff on short leashes, of course. All of this is purely a hypothetical statement on my part.
Of course.
Moe Lane
PS: These tweets seem apropos:
@asymmetricinfo good opportunity to test the reality-based blogging community
— Garett Jones (@GarettJones) April 15, 2014
Indeed. Interested to see who defends this. RT @GarettJones: @asymmetricinfo good opportunity to test the reality-based blogging community
— Megan McArdle (@asymmetricinfo) April 15, 2014
PPS: Guess I got answered, by the way:
.@sarahkliff …Yes, but it's going to really help with your shop's partisan messaging on #Obamacare. So what's *your* beef? @bdomenech
— Moe Lane (@moelane) April 15, 2014
Juice box mafia?
.
Mew
She is assuming the information would be helpful to her side as opposed to otherwise. Which is probably the case and the reason for the changes. I am kind of surprised that they caught this in advance.