Looking at the recent House special election record.

Now that we’ve had some time to digest last week’s special election results – or, in the Democrats’ case, have the equivalent of a gallstone attack over them – I think that it’s a time that we look at some of the House’s special election results over the last two election cycles generally.  Partially because we’re starting to get enough samples to do a laughingly pseudo-scientific analysis of them; and partially because doing so will allow us to destroy the Other Side’s laughingly pseudo-scientific analysis.  Less cynically, there are general trends that might be discernible, down there in the muck.

Below the fold is a look at every special election to date in the 111th and 112th Congress.  I chose not to look at the 110th Congress because I’ll readily enough concede that the net +3 Democratic gain was part of that party’s generally successful 2008 election strategy –  although I note with some amusement that the three seats (IL-14, LA-06, & MS-01) all flipped back in the 2010 election, which means that it was a wash overall anyway.  I also didn’t include LA-01’s flip (and flip-back), mostly because while Cao’s win looked like a special election it really wasn’t.  Likewise, it was also a wash.

 

Continue reading Looking at the recent House special election record.

I guess it’s easier to blame Bayh than to blame themselves. #rsrh

I just wanted to break this not-really-gently, to the relevant indivduals involved:

While many Senate Democrats share Bayh’s frustration with Washington partisanship and stalling on major bills, some are angry that he’s stepping all over their 2010 message: that the 111th Congress has been one of the most productive in a generation, that the stimulus stemmed the tide of job losses and that Republicans, not Democrats, deserve most of the blame for the paralysis afflicting Capitol Hill.

It ain’t Bayh that did the stepping.  At least, it wasn’t just Bayh.  His fellow caucus members have done an absolutely wizzo job at making sure the American populace recognizes that this ‘2010 message’ of the Democrats has pretty much no relationship whatsoever to ordinary, boring, Reality Non-Unicorn.

Umm.  Thanks?

Moe Lane

Admit it: if I pulled out a taser… #rsrh

…and told you that you had ten seconds to explain to me what the heck the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 actually did, how likely would it be that you’d be able to avoid doing your impersonation of a sufferer of St. Vitus’ Dance?

Don’t feel bad: I had to look it up myself (and I would have guessed unemployment benefits, or something).  The Democrats talk of it a lot, but don’t actually talk about it.  The law “amends the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stating that the 180-day statute of limitations for filing an equal-pay lawsuit regarding pay discrimination resets with each new discriminatory paycheck.”  Not precisely the New Deal there, huh?

I bring this up because, as near as Jim Geraghty and I can figure out, this is pretty much all that the Democratic party can brag about to its base with regard to the accomplishments of the 111th Congress.  Although if they want to run on the Democrats’ ‘stimulus’ bill I’ll be happy to let them…

Moe Lane

*Yes. This is what they have to work with when it comes to bragging rights.