Hey, White House: how’s that response to the Logan Act petition going?

Don’t think that the rest of us haven’t forgotten about the fact that at least 317 thousand Democrats can be accurately described as a “feebleminded, pig-ignorant would-be monarchist who is absolutely desperate to abandon the responsibilities of a citizen of the Republic and instead bow his or her servile neck to a mortal king.”  Nah, we haven’t forgotten at all. And it’s going to be awesome to watch the White House try to thread the needle on this one.

Sure, sure, the White House doesn’t really have the clock start ticking on this one until thirty days have passed (which basically means, no earlier than the first week or so of April).  But they probably should start working on a suitable answer early.  After all, the best mendacity takes time to prepare.

Moe Lane

Why the ‘We the People’ Logan Act online petition is unintentionally hysterical.

You know what my favorite thing is about the We the People “File charges against the 47 U.S. Senators in violation of The Logan Act in attempting to undermine a nuclear agreement” petition?

  • It’s not that the author of it doesn’t understand that the Senate is explicitly empowered by the Constitution to advise and consent (which includes ‘withholding consent,’ for the benefit of progressives and other buffoons) in the matter of treaties.
  • It’s not that the author of it doesn’t even understand the difference between ‘violating the Logan Act’ and ‘treason.’
  • And it’s not even that every person who has signed this petition has outed him or herself as a feebleminded, pig-ignorant would-be monarchist who is absolutely desperate to abandon the responsibilities of a citizen of the Republic and instead bow his or her servile neck to a mortal king.

Continue reading Why the ‘We the People’ Logan Act online petition is unintentionally hysterical.