Because MA Democratic party spokesmen are starting to talk about how they’re not even talking about replacing Ms. Warren somehow. For those unfamiliar with the rough-and-tumble of political campaigns – which is to say, people like Elizabeth Warren – this is the first warning sign that the leadership of a political party is quietly talking about replacing a substandard candidate somehow. So… maybe it’s time to let things simmer, as it were.
Yes, I am fully cognizant of the counter-argument that you don’t want to let up on a wounded opposing candidate, but there is the niggling detail that Elizabeth Warren is not yet officially the candidate. The Democrats could conceivably still blitz an alternative that can gather the signatures for the June 5th deadline and get the 15% of delegates necessary at the June 2nd convention to get on the September primary ballot*; and if there’s too much panic, they probably will. The only reason that they haven’t, yet, is because Warren has a lot of money and her major primary opponent wants to use the MA-SEN race to argue about how we need single-payer health care; given that Scott Brown won successfully on being the sixtieth vote against Obamacare, you can imagine just how well that particular policy position sits with the MA Democratic brass. But the Democrats can still decide that they might as well take a chance, so hey: let’s be careful out there.
On the bright side, we still have time to calibrate our erosion of Elizabeth Warren: nobody from the MA Democratic party is talking about how they have every confidence in her. That is actually a code phrase for “ATTENTION ALL OPERATIVES: you have been compromised. I repeat, you have been compromised. Shred the books, trash the hard drive, and sanitize the area before you fall back to the safe house for later extraction.”
Via The Campaign Spot.
*The system is very well-designed, is it not? …For a given value of ‘well-designed.’