Gallup plays greatest practical joke on Democrats since Woodrow Wilson candidacy.

Look at this title and subtitle: great news for Democrats, right?

2012 U.S. Electorate Looks Like 2008

Composition of electorate by race, age, gender essentially the same

Yup, horrible news… wait a second.  Notice what’s missing from that subtitle?  As in, what rather important category?  For an election?  You know… political affiliation?

Yeah, well, there’s a reason for that.

In 2008, Gallup had the electorate as being +10 Democrat (+12 Democrat, with leaners).  Right now, they’re forecasting it as being +1 Republican (+3 Republican, with leaners).  Which means that by the most important criterion of the Presidential election 2012 is not like 2008 at all: it’s like 2004 (+2 Republican/even, with leaners).  Which means that the subtext of the title (“Democrats gonna win!”) is actually completely subverted by the implications of the data (“Democrats gonna lose!”).

I take some pleasure in being an aggravating so-and-so to the Online Left, but I have to say: this is epic trolling by Gallup.  I would like to think that I could come up with something this contemptuously brilliant, but I am forced to admit that I am unsure that I could pull it off.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

10 thoughts on “Gallup plays greatest practical joke on Democrats since Woodrow Wilson candidacy.”

  1. Know what I like even more than the numbers? Your name for the snapshot, DoomGallup.jpg. Eagerly awaiting the official call of DOOM.

  2. RE-calculate all of October polls with R+1, or heck, call it even, and what do we have? A Romney landslide. Grab your surf boards, boys!

  3. Is this one of those moments when it’s cool to start a “slow clap”?

    /looks around and starts slowly clapping

  4. If the 2008 demographics show up to vote and that creates an R+1 electorate as opposed to D+7, then wouldn’t that indicate a shift in minority voting preferences that could possibly be DOOM-worthy for years to come?

  5. Maybe Gallup is just splitting the difference by reporting the real data, but using a fake headline to make Axelgrease happy.

  6. Why aren’t you saying your usual DOOM? If this is true, that’s exactly how I’d interpret it. 🙂

Comments are closed.