When I read yet another article that uses faulty argumentation, bad assumptions, and/or obsolete data to come to the conclusion that no DOOM looms for the Democrats this November, I have to remember… I must let them do this and not interfere.
But it’s hard.
Oh, so hard.
Any specific examples?
I *love* reading “cocooning” articles like that… 😀
IJB: David Corn’s piece on some DCCC head flunky. It’s months out of date; he clearly wrote it in April or May and didn’t update it before it published. Either that, or he’s in heavy denial. Or both.