It’s a good an explanation as any for this otherwise slightly-bizarre piece on Media Matters’ inability to move the media needle on a ‘story’ about Fox News that required the reader to simply take the unsupported word of an anonymous former Fox News employee that Bad Things Are Happening. Left-porn, in other words: and when you look at it that way the aforementioned inability is not only not surprising at all; it almost makes one feel kind of sad and melancholy on Media Matters’ behalf. That is, until you remember that Media Matters is a virulent Lefty shill that wants half the country to die in a fire. Then you get over it.
But one thing that I will bring up, with malice aforethought: since when has Media Matters actually been effectual? I mean, I’ve been in this gig since about 2003 or so; and I’ve been with RedState for over half a decade. We move the media needle all the time. I’ve seen it. I’ve done it. And in all that time, I can’t think of a single specific event where Media Matters has been the point site for ruining a conservative’s day. And apparently, neither could Mediate: their assertion of Media Matters’ relevance is as sourced as the original Fox-bashing report that sparked the article (i.e., not at all). That’s so… unlikely… that I actually can’t quite believe it.
So help me out, here? Surely Media Matters has earned their corn once since they came into existence.
Moe Lane
They employed Oliver Willis.
In the appropriate circles, there’s almost an infinite market for pr0n, even political pr0n. Which isn’t to say that those particular circles aren’t getting smaller all the time..
So Media Matters doesn’t actually matter?