Add the Washington Post to the list of those who never researched Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby.

Sheesh.

The Supreme Court's 49-page Hobby Lobby ruling mentioned women just 13 times http://t.co/jFyktUDb2D

— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) July 1, 2014

Neil’s comment is apropos, here:

RT @washingtonpost: The Supreme Court's 49-page Hobby Lobby ruling never mentioned the word "Vitametavegamin"

— Neil Stevens (@presjpolk) July 1, 2014

Seriously, we may have to start an affirmative action program to force academics and the media to take in actual conservatives and religious people, just so that the Left can learn to appreciate the Other.

Moe Lane

PS: You cannot force a clear-cut First Amendment case to be about whatever the hell the Democrats need this week to avoid an electoral blowout. Reality doesn’t work that way.