It’d almost be an act of cruelty to deploy one of those things. I say ‘almost’ because at the moment you can’t actually be cruel to a machine.
In 1924 someone envisioned robots to beat the crap out of protestors pic.twitter.com/hS7yJ4e7Dp
— Hell is Empty (@Sleestak) December 30, 2014
I stopped counting the failure points on that design after the first half-dozen. Yeah, I know: robotics was not exactly a mature science in 1924. But did anybody really think to look at the design? Sheesh.
Via
Robocop 1.0! RT @Sleestak: In 1924 someone envisioned robots to beat the crap out of protestors pic.twitter.com/iLpX0Q9PIN
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) December 31, 2014
…and I’d say Robocop 0.5.
From the mind of Hugo Gernsback. Yes, *that* Hugo.
I’m thinking it was designed by the illustrator. At no point was an actual engineer even in the room.
I remember designing things like that. In junior high.
Although I’m pretty sure even a 13 year old me would have been puzzled at having both tracks *and* legs as essential.
My immediate thought is those flails they mount on vehicles for mine clearing. Problem a) is that like tanks, they would need infantry support. Problem b) is the gunslinger girl one, an organization capable of it could solve the problem more efficiently with more conventional means.
.
My go to dream solution to riots involves quality Roman infantry. If we had enough ‘lost legions’ on hand, they would also be a source of political problems.
That’s an unfortunate choice of location for the tear gas outlet.
C’mon. A robot that pisses tear gas and poops engine exhaust? What’s not to love?