I saw an interesting article, but it was on a Gawker satellite site…

11 thoughts on “I saw an interesting article, but it was on a Gawker satellite site…”

1. But not nearly as hard as Hogan will.

   1. And ain’t that a shame.

2. Heh. I feel dirty, but I still check out i09 about once a day or so. It may be filled with left wing claptrap, but they still have an interesting article every so often.

3. I agree. Screw ’em. I drew the line at PuffHo years ago, these bozos are worse.

4. Purged Kotaku and Jalopnik from my rotation. I only visited iO9 from links, so I didn’t have to do anything in particular. Haven’t noticed a great loss.

5. Is there a handy reference of sites to not visit? I mean, I could limit myself to MoeLane and Slashdot, but ..
   .
   Mew

   1. You can go where you like; but if we don’t punish Gawker sites for being Gawker sites then they’ll just keep being Gawker sites. 🙂

      1. This isn’t some stealth objection to the tactic, I’d prefer not to hand links to [redacted] like Gawker, but .. I suck at figuring out who owns what…
         .
         So .. from this thread, I’ll be avoiding Jalopnik (which was, back in its’ heyday, readable ..haven’t visited in a long while) and Kotaku (never heard of it) and IO9 (never heard of it either) and … ?
         .
         Mew

         1. Per
            .
            https://wiki.gamergate.me/index.php?title=Operation_Baby_Seal
            .
            ‘Gawker and its subsidiaries (which include Valleywag, Defamer, Kotaku, Gizmodo, Jezebel, Lifehacker, Deadspin, Screamer, The Concourse, io9, Sploid, Jalopnik, Truck Yeah!, and Cink) ‘

            1. Okay, yeah, not missing much.
               .
               Thank you.
               .
               Mew

   2. Wait, people still read /.?

Comments are closed.