I saw an interesting article, but it was on a Gawker satellite site…

11 thoughts on “I saw an interesting article, but it was on a Gawker satellite site…”

1. But not nearly as hard as Hogan will.

   1. And ain’t that a shame.

2. Heh. I feel dirty, but I still check out i09 about once a day or so. It may be filled with left wing claptrap, but they still have an interesting article every so often.

3. I agree. Screw ’em. I drew the line at PuffHo years ago, these bozos are worse.

4. Purged Kotaku and Jalopnik from my rotation. I only visited iO9 from links, so I didn’t have to do anything in particular. Haven’t noticed a great loss.

5. Is there a handy reference of sites to not visit? I mean, I could limit myself to MoeLane and Slashdot, but ..
   .
   Mew

   1. You can go where you like; but if we don’t punish Gawker sites for being Gawker sites then they’ll just keep being Gawker sites.

      1. This isn’t some stealth objection to the tactic, I’d prefer not to hand links to [redacted] like Gawker, but .. I suck at figuring out who owns what…
         .
         So .. from this thread, I’ll be avoiding Jalopnik (which was, back in its’ heyday, readable ..haven’t visited in a long while) and Kotaku (never heard of it) and IO9 (never heard of it either) and … ?
         .
         Mew

         1. Per
            .
            https://wiki.gamergate.me/index.php?title=Operation_Baby_Seal
            .
            ‘Gawker and its subsidiaries (which include Valleywag, Defamer, Kotaku, Gizmodo, Jezebel, Lifehacker, Deadspin, Screamer, The Concourse, io9, Sploid, Jalopnik, Truck Yeah!, and Cink) ‘

            1. Okay, yeah, not missing much.
               .
               Thank you.
               .
               Mew

   2. Wait, people still read /.?

Comments are closed.