(H/T: @NathanWurtzel) The New York Times apparently had one mission: use the word ‘Jewish’ as many times as it took to associate that word with opposition to the Iran deal.
— Rosie Gray (@RosieGray) September 10, 2015
Despite the fact that, as the NYT itself noted, more Jewish Democratic legislators support the Iran deal than oppose it. Now, I think that supporting the Iran deal is stupid, on general principles, and general secular principles at that. But since the NYT is determined to drag religion into this whole, dreary mess, I have to ask: just what benefit do Jewish Democrats get from being Democrats? They’re certainly not avoiding becoming the subject of NYT hit pieces!
One thought on “The NYT mutters fitfully about Jewish legislator opposition to Iran deal.”
It does not matter how secular you are, you will always be considered a Jew first, last, and only by the anti-Semites; and the Progressives are very anti-Semitic.
Comments are closed.